Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2015–2022

Kohl's sold rayon as bamboo and eco-friendly — the FTC fined it $2.5M for the deception

Kohl's marketed rayon as bamboo and eco-friendly. But making rayon from bamboo uses toxic chemicals; the FTC called the claims deceptive and fined Kohl's $2.5M.

Kohl's · 2022

What happened

Kohl's, the American department-store chain, marketed at least two dozen textile products — apparel and home goods — as made of bamboo, in both product titles and descriptions, and promoted some as environmentally friendly, even 'free of harmful chemicals, using clean, non-toxic materials.' Walmart did the same. The fabrics were not bamboo in any meaningful sense: they were rayon derived from bamboo, which the companies did not disclose.

The distinction mattered. Turning bamboo into rayon requires toxic chemicals and produces hazardous pollutants — the opposite of the eco-friendly image the marketing suggested. The Federal Trade Commission said the claims were deceptive, and that the products had been mislabeled in violation of the Textile Fiber Products Identification Act as well as advertised falsely under the FTC Act.

On 8 April 2022 Kohl's agreed to pay $2.5 million to settle the charges; Walmart paid $3 million, $5.5 million between them — by far the largest penalties the FTC had brought in this area. The agency used its Penalty Offense Authority, which lets it seek civil penalties once a company has been warned in a prior written decision that a practice is unlawful.

The case was a lesson in how literally a regulator reads a green claim. 'Made from bamboo' sounded natural and sustainable; the process behind it was neither. The marketing borrowed the goodwill of an eco-friendly material the product did not actually deliver, and the FTC priced the gap.

Why it happened

  • The marketing borrowed the goodwill of bamboo — natural, sustainable — for a product that was rayon, made through a toxic chemical process
  • A green claim is judged on what it literally says, not the feeling it creates; both 'bamboo' and 'eco-friendly' were false once the rayon process was examined
  • Mislabeling the fiber broke the Textile Act as well as the ban on deceptive advertising, so one marketing choice carried two violations
  • The Penalty Offense Authority meant that once the practice had been ruled unlawful, continuing it carried civil penalties — the cost of ignoring a written warning
What it cost$2.5M FTC penalty; 'bamboo' claims debunkedembarrassing

The lesson

Green claims are read precisely. Rayon from bamboo is still rayon, made with toxic chemicals; calling it bamboo and eco-friendly was deception. Outrun the product and it's false advertising.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →