Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2023

Target's Pride collection triggered a boycott that erased a decade of sales growth

Backlash over pentagram-print pieces in a 2023 Pride line hit stores. Target pulled items and moved displays; sales fell for the first time in six years.

Target · 2023-05

What happened

In May 2023, Target rolled out its annual Pride Month merchandise collection, including a line from transgender designer Erik Carnell's Abprallen label. Some Abprallen pieces featured pentagrams and horned-skull imagery, which conservative commentators and customers seized on as evidence of a broader ideological agenda.

The backlash moved from social media into stores: customers confronted employees, tipped over Pride displays, and some locations reported abusive incidents. Target responded by pulling a portion of the roughly 2,000-item collection and relocating Pride displays to the back of some stores, citing employee safety.

The retreat satisfied neither side — LGBTQ+ advocates called it a capitulation, while the original critics kept the boycott alive. Target's comparable sales fell 5% or more in the following quarter, its first decline in six years, e-commerce sales fell over 10%, and the stock dropped nearly 20% from its mid-May level. A shareholder lawsuit later accused the company of misleading investors about the risk of its DEI-linked merchandising decisions.

Why it happened

  • Including provocative imagery (pentagrams, horned skulls) inside a Pride collection gave critics a concrete visual to rally against, rather than an abstract objection to Pride itself.
  • Partial retreat — pulling some items, hiding others — read as an admission of fault to critics and as abandonment to supporters, satisfying neither audience.
  • Physical store displays made the backlash tangible and immediate in a way a purely online controversy would not have been, escalating it into confrontations with staff.
  • The company had run Pride collections in prior years without this reaction, so the specific pieces and their imagery, not Pride merchandising in general, were the proximate trigger.
What it costsales down 5%+, stock down ~20%, a shareholder suitcostly

The lesson

A values-driven collection needs every piece vetted against the controversy it could hand critics — one collaborator's imagery undid a campaign whose weak point was execution, not the theme.

Aftermath

Target continued Pride merchandising in later years at reduced scale and visibility, and the episode became a frequently cited example of how a partial retreat under pressure can cost a brand support from both sides of a controversy at once.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →