The encyclopedia · Legal & Compliance · Legal decision · 2025-2026
Kim Soo-hyun's advertisers sued him — and one claim grew from 500M to 2.86B won
Advertisers who dropped him in 2025 sued for damages — the cosmetics claim grew from 500M to 2.86B won before the courts started cutting.
Cuckoo Electronics · Eider · Kim Soo-hyun (actor) · 2025-11-21
What happened
In March 2025, allegations about Kim Soo-hyun's private life triggered a mass withdrawal of advertisers, documented in the archive's Prada entry. Months later the bills arrived: three advertisers sued the actor and his agency Gold Medalist over terminated endorsement contracts, and the first hearing was held on 21 November 2025 at Seoul Central District Court.
The cosmetics brand's claim grew at that hearing from the 500M-won class to 2.86B won — double his model fee under the contract's breach clause. The brand argued the allegations violated the contract's duty to maintain dignity; the actor's side answered that no specific act had been shown to breach it.
The other claims followed the same shape: Cuckoo Electronics sued for about 2B won, and Eider claimed 2.5B won. Industry estimates put the total wave in the 10B-won class — the largest legal aftermath of the 2025 endorser exodus.
By 2026 the courts were cutting the bills down: at an 8 July 2026 hearing Eider's claim was reduced to 400M won, with the court saying it would be hard to accept a withdrawal and indicating Eider would bear litigation costs. The next hearing was set for 26 August 2026.
Why it happened
- The dignity clause became the battleground: advertisers argued the allegations breached his duty to maintain public dignity; his side answered that no specific act had been shown to breach it.
- The claims escalated at the first hearing: the cosmetics claim grew from the 500M-won class to 2.86B won, and the three suits together put the wave in the 10B-won class.
- The courts pushed back: by July 2026, Eider's 2.5B-won claim had been cut to 400M won, with the court signalling that a withdrawal would leave the plaintiff paying the costs — the bills shrank.
- The lawsuits made the scandal measurable: termination was the 2025 story; 2026 turned it into a ledger of claims, reductions and court costs.
The lesson
The dignity clause cut both ways: advertisers claimed double fees after terminating, and the courts answered by cutting the claims.
Sources
- YTN — Cosmetics brand sues Kim Soo-hyun and Gold Medalist; claim raised to 2.86B won at the first hearing
- Chosun Biz — Kim Soo-hyun advertiser lawsuits resume; 2.8B-won case back in court
- MK — Dignity-clause dispute in the Kim Soo-hyun lawsuits
- Star News via Nate — Eider reduces claim from 2.5B to 400M won; court skeptical
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Seedmol's collaboration with a controversial streamer broke a decade of customer trust
A skincare brand's collab with a creator lasted one day before a customer revolt
Isoi's '625% penetration' bus ad read as a Korean War joke — the CEO apologised
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.