The encyclopedia · Strategy & Leadership · Strategic decision · 2013–2018
KIKO Milano opened 29 US stores in five years — then closed 24 in a bankruptcy
Italy's biggest cosmetics retailer opened 29 US mall stores starting in 2013. By 2018, mall traffic was collapsing and KIKO USA filed Chapter 11.
KIKO S.p.A. · KIKO USA · Percassi Group · 2018-01
What happened
KIKO S.p.A., Italy's largest cosmetics retailer owned by the Percassi Group, began its US expansion in 2013, opening stores in American shopping malls. By 2018, KIKO USA operated 29 domestic stores and one in Puerto Rico, selling affordable makeup positioned between luxury and mass-market cosmetics. The parent company operated approximately 1,000 stores across 21 countries.
The US expansion collided with the structural decline of American mall traffic. Physical-store sales fell faster than the company could adjust its cost base through lease negotiations. CEO Frank Furlan was directed to negotiate lower rents and early lease terminations, but only one landlord agreed to a buyout. High rents and operating costs produced continually depressed profits. In January 2018, KIKO USA filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in Delaware.
The restructuring plan closed 24 of 29 stores, retaining five in strategic locations — New York, Miami, Los Angeles and Las Vegas. The closures were expected to reduce annual operating losses by $7.1 million, though $3.9 million in real estate costs remained. E-commerce sales through KIKO's website and Amazon were growing in double digits, but not fast enough to offset the physical-store decline. Amazon already held 21.1% of the US beauty market, threatening even marketplace sellers with private-label competition.
Why it happened
- KIKO's US expansion was timed to the peak of American mall retail, just as foot traffic began its structural decline and e-commerce accelerated.
- The company signed long-term mall leases at high rents without the flexibility to exit when sales underperformed, and only one landlord agreed to an early buyout.
- A mid-price positioning between luxury and mass-market cosmetics left KIKO squeezed from both sides: luxury brands had stronger pull, and Amazon offered cheaper alternatives at scale.
- Double-digit e-commerce growth was real but insufficient to offset the fixed-cost burden of 29 physical stores in a channel that was dying.
The lesson
Expanding a brick-and-mortar format into a market where the channel is in structural decline turns every new store into a liability. Lease flexibility is not optional when the ground shifts.
Aftermath
KIKO USA retained five stores and pivoted toward e-commerce, Amazon, and third-party retail partnerships. The parent company KIKO S.p.A. continued to operate profitably in Europe and other markets, demonstrating that the failure was specific to the US mall-based expansion strategy, not the brand or product.
Sources
- Cosmetics Business — KIKO USA files for bankruptcy after struggling to make sales (2018)
- Retail Dive — Beauty retailer KIKO USA files for bankruptcy (2018)
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Sunnei was the Italian fashion darling that burned through hype and cash
Cover FX winds down after sales collapse
Bata chased Italy's shopping malls for a decade — then the rent caught up
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.