The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Operational decision · 2021
JNBY's kids' line printed 'Welcome to hell' and severed limbs on children's clothes
In September 2021, jnby by JNBY kids' clothes carried 'Welcome to hell' and severed-limb prints — the brand was summoned.
JNBY (江南布衣) · 2021-09
What happened
In mid-September 2021, bloggers and parents began posting photos of 江南布衣's children's line jnby by JNBY showing prints that were dark and sexual on clothes meant for kids: English text reading 'Welcome to hell' (欢迎来到地狱) and 'Let me touch you', engraved motifs of severed limbs, blown-out heads, Satan and hammers, and a girl's dress printed with a woman spreading her legs over her genitals — an image cropped from the painting The Garden of Earthly Delights.
The prints were not an accident nobody noticed: users traced similar imagery back to 2017, and pointed out that the offending art was selected from famous comics and paintings but only the most disturbing fragments were used — a child's vest carrying '到处都是印第安人,我要拿起枪把它们射成碎片' taken from a Little Nemo panel, and the 下体 image from Hieronymus Bosch.
On 23 September 2021 the brand's official Weibo issued a letter to consumers, saying it had pulled the affected series, withdrawn its marketing materials and set up a task force to self-inspect, and opened return channels. But the apology was read as cold — '个别产品' (individual products) — and an earlier attempt on 21 September had been buried in a comment thread, which many called insincere.
On 26 September the Hangzhou Xihu District government's @西湖发布 account announced it had summoned the company, ordered the affected children's clothing and similar styles be pulled immediately, required no-questions-asked returns, and set up a market-regulation investigation team. By 24 September the Hong Kong-listed stock had fallen 13.21% in a day, wiping about 6 billion yuan off the founders' holdings.
Why it happened
- The design team selected shocking fragments from famous art and comics and put them on children's clothes, so the creative decision itself was the offence
- Questionable imagery had been on sale since about 2017, so the company let a known problem run for years until a hashtag forced action
- The first apology sat in a comment thread and the formal one called them 'individual products', so the response read as dismissive rather than accountable
The lesson
Creative approval is a gate, not a signature: dark art does not become innocent by being cropped onto a child's garment, and a brand that reviews for shock always gets read for what it actually sold.
Aftermath
JNBY pulled the clothes, was summoned and investigated by Xihu District regulators, and its stock dropped sharply. The case stayed a standing example in China of adult artistic imagery being put on children's clothing, and the brand faced a second, similar controversy in 2022 when '奇怪画风' prints surfaced again.
Sources
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Victoria's Secret went quiet when its new China ambassador fell into a copyright row
MAC erased its ambassador one day after she was cleared
Clarins named Jin Chen its makeup ambassador the day before her hit-and-run exploded
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.