The encyclopedia · Strategy & Leadership · Strategic decision · 2017–2026
JD built Seven Fresh to counter Hema — 8 years on it closes stores and retreats
Seven Fresh took 8 years to build 71 stores. In mid-2026 it closed 5 in three months — big stores picked away from the communities that could fill them.
Seven Fresh (七鲜) · JD.com (京东) · 2026-07
What happened
Seven Fresh was JD's answer to Hema: founded in April 2017, a network fusing offline supermarkets with self-operated front warehouses. Eight years on it had built just 71 stores — roughly nine a year — with about 40 in Beijing, 10 in Tianjin and 10 in Guangzhou, and over 95% of locations in tier-1 and new tier-1 cities. It fought with price, pitching goods about 10% below competitors, even as management flagged the sustainability of profitability and rivals Hema and Dingdong only just turned profitable.
In mid-2026 the network shrank in its home market: five stores closed within three months — Beijing's Fengtai, Daxing and Fangshan districts, plus core Tianjin locations. The reasons were internal: single-store financial models that didn't clear the bar, leases expiring or rents outrunning revenue, and big-format sites chosen away from community living circles, with narrow customer bases whose revenue never covered rent, labor and cold-chain costs.
The retreat executes a focus set in 2022 — Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and the Greater Bay Area — now run as 'digging wells instead of casting nets': denser stores around mature communities, shorter delivery radii, lower spoilage. Seven Fresh also took over former RT-Mart space in Beijing, swapping one retreating format's shell for its own. For JD, the supermarket counterattack that began as a Hema challenger ends as a regional optimizer — eight years of capital for two regions, and a site-selection lesson paid in closed doors.
Why it happened
- The store model was wrong for the site: big-format supermarkets placed away from community living circles drew narrow customer bases whose revenue couldn't cover rent, labor and cold chain.
- Price was the only weapon — goods about 10% below rivals — while profitability stayed an open question; Hema and Dingdong turned profitable first.
- Scale came too slowly to matter: ~9 stores a year for 8 years left Seven Fresh at 71 doors against rivals' citywide coverage, and the 2026 correction closed five in three months.
The lesson
A challenger built on price and capital dies by site selection. JD's Seven Fresh took 8 years to build 71 stores, closed five in three months — the big-format sites sat away from the communities.
Aftermath
The plan now is density over breadth: more stores around mature communities, shorter delivery radii, and Tianjin expansion rebuilt around warehouse-stores rather than big supermarkets. The 2025 plan to add 20 Tianjin warehouse-stores sits beside the 2026 closures of core-city doors — the network grows where the model works and retreats where it never did. Whether a two-region Seven Fresh can earn its keep inside JD's instant-retail war is the next reckoning.
Sources
- 36kr — Nearly 8 years, 70+ stores: JD's Seven Fresh needs scale, 2025-03-17
- Dashu Cross-border — JD Seven Fresh closes 5 stores in a row, 2026-07-06
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Knocked back ten years: Pou Sheng's Nike and Adidas trap
Record revenue, doubled loss: Harmony Auto's BYD-overseas bet
Baiguoyuan said it would educate consumers — the consumers taught back
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.