What happened
Pat Gelsinger returned in 2021 to fix Intel’s tailspin — missed smartphones, delayed chips, quality problems, Apple and later Microsoft leaving for Arm — with the most ambitious plan in its history: “five nodes in four years”, unlimited budgets for the technology departments, tens of billions in new US fabs, and opening Intel’s factories to competitors as a foundry.
The plan came at staggering cost while shipped products suffered: reports of permanent damage on two generations of desktop CPUs, features allegedly cut for cost, and an AI business that could not meet even softened targets — Gaudi missed a $500 million revenue promise while Nvidia soared. In August 2024 Intel announced over 15,000 layoffs; the stock dropped 26% in a day after Q2 results.
Q3 2024 produced a $16.6 billion loss, the worst quarter in Intel’s history, largely a restructuring bill. On December 2, 2024 Gelsinger abruptly retired; Reuters, Bloomberg and The New York Times reported the board pushed him out, having lost confidence in a plan “not showing results quickly enough”. The Times also reported customers were told Intel’s 18A process yielded under 10% flawless chips versus TSMC’s 30% on 2nm — yields Gelsinger disputed.
What it cost
$16.6 billion lost in Q3 2024, the worst quarter in Intel's history; stock dropped 26% in one day; over 15,000 layoffs; market value roughly halved.
Why it happened
The foundry bet consumed tens of billions while the products funding it were starved — ex-employees say features like the Adamantine cache were cut for cost.
Intel missed the AI wave twice: Ponte Vecchio was designed for the wrong operations, and the Nervana acquisition was smothered instead of integrated.
Gelsinger 'called the bottom' too early — austerity and salary cuts in 2022 followed by mass layoffs in 2024 — confusing investors right before the worst quarter in company history.
The lesson
A turnaround funded by a blank check can hollow out the products that pay for it — customers and quality cannot wait four years for the strategy to land.
Aftermath
Gelsinger left with no planned successor and declined to stay as an adviser. Intel is receiving nearly $8 billion in CHIPS Act funding, which restricts buybacks and gives Washington oversight, and analysts speculate the board may go further than Gelsinger's announced foundry spinoff — potentially following AMD's 2008 fabless precedent.
FOLLOW THE EVIDENCE
The sources
- What happened to Intel? theverge.com