Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Strategy & Leadership · Strategic decision · 2001–2008

ImClone bet everything on one FDA approval — then its CEO sold the bad news

A biotech staked everything on one FDA approval; when the agency refused, the CEO's insider sales nearly destroyed the company.

ImClone Systems · 2001-12

What happened

ImClone Systems was a biotech founded in 1984 with one serious asset: Erbitux (cetuximab), an experimental antibody for colorectal cancer. In September 2001 Bristol-Myers Squibb paid $2 billion — a billion of it up front — for less than a fifth of the company, betting on the drug's blockbuster potential. The stock ran to $70, and ImClone submitted its application for FDA approval.

The FDA refused to file it, over concerns about the clinical trial's structure. Sam Waksal, the founder and CEO, learned on the evening of December 26 that the refusal was coming; the announcement was set for the close of trading on December 28. In between he tried to sell nearly 80,000 of his own shares — two brokers refused to execute the orders — and tipped his family, who sold more than $10 million of stock over two days. The FDA faxed its decision at 4 p.m. on December 28; ImClone announced it at 6 p.m. The stock dropped 16 percent in three days and kept falling.

The SEC charged Waksal on June 12, 2002. He pleaded guilty that October to securities fraud, bank fraud, obstruction of justice and perjury, and was sentenced to seven years and three months in prison. A congressional hearing uncovered a board that had tolerated him since a 1986 signature forgery; the general counsel called it 'a good-faith misunderstanding' and no one ever acted. The scandal touched everyone around him — Martha Stewart sold about $230,000 of ImClone stock on a tip from her broker and went to prison for lying about it — while Bristol-Myers's $2 billion bet evaporated.

The company survived its founder. Merck KGaA ran a new trial and won approval on February 12, 2004, and Erbitux became a blockbuster, passing $1.5 billion in sales by 2008. But the scandal had cost ImClone its momentum and its independence: a 2006 sale attempt failed, Carl Icahn took control of the board in October 2006, and after a bidding war Eli Lilly bought the company for $6.5 billion in October 2008 — $70 a share, the price the stock had last seen before the refusal.

Why it happened

  • ImClone bet its entire future on one approval: the September 2001 deal valued the company on Erbitux alone, so the FDA's refusal left it with no second act.
  • The founder answered a business setback with a crime: Waksal learned the refusal was coming, sold, tipped his family, and turned a regulatory delay into a securities scandal.
  • The board failed its one job: directors had tolerated Waksal since a 1986 forged signature and never acted, so the October 2002 hearing found no one had been watching the CEO.
  • The deal's own pressure wrote the script: a $2 billion valuation demanded a fast approval, and the company filed before its trial data could carry the application.
What it costa $2 billion partnership, and its independencecostly

The lesson

A company that is one approval away from everything is one refusal away from nothing: when the whole bet rests on a single milestone, the founder's panic decides how the story ends.

Aftermath

The drug and the company both recovered: Merck KGaA won approval on 12 February 2004, and Erbitux passed $1.5 billion in sales by 2008. The scandal's cost was independence — a 2006 sale attempt failed, Carl Icahn took board control that October, and Eli Lilly bought ImClone for $6.5 billion on 6 October 2008, at $70 a share. Waksal was released from prison in February 2009, his fines and back taxes running past $4 million. The case became the reference point for tipping, and the refusal-to-file letter is now understood as a verdict no company built on one drug can ignore.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →