Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Strategy & Leadership · Financial decision · 2017

Huoli Modeng (活力摩簦) ran shared umbrellas for four months, vanished with deposits in doubt

Launched August 2017 planning a million umbrellas on shareholder money alone; by December it had shut, and testers could not get deposits back.

活力摩簦 · 上海天伞网络科技有限公司 · 2017-12

What happened

活力摩簦 (Huoli Modeng) entered the shared-umbrella market in August 2017, with its founder announcing plans to deploy one million umbrellas within a year. In practice the service reached only two cities, Hangzhou and Shenzhen. No outside capital ever came in — the company ran on shareholder self-investment, with revenue resting on user deposits, first 99 yuan and later 39 yuan; advertising income from the umbrella canopies was zero.

By early December 2017 — four months after launch — the company had stopped operating. All employees completed resignation procedures and the office was emptied. Co-founder Yi Xinyu said funding could not keep up with development: the sharing economy needs massive scale to work, and investors in late 2017 wanted companies with cash profits, not burn. Reporters testing the service could neither end usage nor get a deposit refund.

The category around it was just as thin: by mid-2017 China had more than 15 shared-umbrella companies, but only a handful had raised anything, all at angel level, while shared power banks raised 1.2 billion yuan in 40 days. An umbrella's working life was estimated at two years, and rental fees alone could not pay for it. Most of the category faded within a year.

Why it happened

  • A capital-hungry category entered without capital: scale is what makes sharing economics work, and Huoli Modeng had only shareholder money.
  • Deposits were the business: with zero ad revenue and thin rental fees, the 39–99 yuan deposits were the main money in — a loan from users, not revenue.
  • The fundraising window had closed: by late 2017 investors wanted profitable companies, and a two-city umbrella service could not show that.
What it cost4 months, 2 cities, deposits in doubtembarrassing

The lesson

Deposits are a loan, not revenue. With no outside capital and nothing to sell but umbrella use, Huoli Modeng found in four months that the only money left was the users'.

Aftermath

The office emptied and staff left; users were pointed to SMS and WeChat channels for deposit refunds that reporters could not get to work. 活力摩簦 became one of the first named casualties of China's shared-umbrella boom.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →