Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2022

HSBC's climate ads were banned for omitting what the bank actually finances

Two bus-stop posters touted tree-planting and a $1T net-zero pledge. The ASA banned them: HSBC's financed emissions told the other half of the story.

HSBC · 2022-10-19

What happened

In October 2021, ahead of the COP26 climate summit, HSBC put up two bus-stop posters in London and Bristol. One highlighted the bank's pledge to provide $1 trillion in financing for the net-zero transition. The other said HSBC was planting 2 million trees that would 'lock in 1.25 million tonnes of carbon.' The Advertising Standards Authority received 45 complaints, including one from the campaign group Adfree Cities, arguing the ads omitted material information about HSBC's role in financing fossil fuels.

On October 19, 2022, the ASA upheld the complaints. Its ruling noted that HSBC's financed emissions from oil and gas clients alone were approximately 65.3 million tonnes of CO2 per year, and that the bank intended to continue funding thermal coal until 2030 in OECD countries and 2040 elsewhere. The ASA found the ads breached CAP Code rules 3.1, 3.3 and 11.1 by omitting material information and presenting a misleading picture of the bank's overall environmental impact. The ads were banned and HSBC was told not to run them again in their current form.

HSBC responded that the financial sector has a responsibility to communicate its role in the low-carbon transition. The ruling was part of a broader wave of greenwashing scrutiny by the ASA, which had recently taken action against similar claims by other brands.

Why it happened

  • The ads selected the bank's most favourable climate data points while omitting its financed emissions, which were orders of magnitude larger
  • The ASA treated omission of material information as misleading, not just the presence of false claims
  • HSBC's defence — that banks should communicate their transition role — did not address the specific omission the ASA identified
  • The ruling signalled that environmental advertising would be judged against the advertiser's full business, not just the claims in the ad
What it costads banned; ASA ruling; greenwashing labelembarrassing

The lesson

An environmental claim that omits the advertiser's actual impact is not a half-truth — regulators now treat it as a whole lie.

Aftermath

The ASA ruling became a reference point for greenwashing enforcement in UK advertising. HSBC continued its climate communications but with greater care to contextualise its transition financing against its fossil-fuel exposure. The case was cited in subsequent ASA actions against other brands making environmental claims.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →