Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Strategy & Leadership · Strategic decision · 2006–2019

Hanjin Philippines took tax perks for a shipyard model that left $1.3B in debt

The Subic shipyard grew on tax perks, power subsidies and bank debt. When orders thinned, it entered rehabilitation owing banks $1.3 billion.

HHIC-Phil · 2019-01-08

What happened

Hanjin Heavy Industries and Construction Philippines built its Subic Bay shipyard with public concessions attached. It registered for tax perks under the Subic Bay Metropolitan Authority in 2006 and the Board of Investments in 2009. FIRB later said the company received a seven-year income tax holiday, a special 5% tax regime after that holiday expired, duty-free import privileges, and P5.17 billion in power subsidies from 2009 to 2018.

The bargain was supposed to create and maintain industrial scale. FIRB said HHIC-Phil failed to maintain an estimated 20,000 workers and did not proceed with a planned $2 billion Mindanao shipyard that was expected to create 30,000 jobs. The Subic yard was therefore not just a private capacity bet; it was a public-incentive bet on shipbuilding volume that had to keep arriving.

On 8 January 2019, the company announced bankruptcy and sought voluntary rehabilitation in Subic. PhilStar reported that it owed $412 million to Philippine banks and another $900 million to Korean banks. The affected local lenders included RCBC, Land Bank, Metrobank, BPI and BDO. A commentary in the same paper pointed to an unexpected glut in shipbuilding demand caused by continued uncertainty in world trade, plus heavy debt and revenues that had fallen behind.

The bill outlived the company. In 2022, FIRB said the failed shipyard had cost the government at least P370 million in 2015 income-tax-holiday revenue and P5.17 billion in power subsidies from 2009 to 2018. The former Hanjin yard was later taken over for redevelopment, but the incentive review board used the collapse as a warning that tax privileges need stricter performance checks before they are granted.

Why it happened

  • The company built a capital-heavy shipyard around debt and incentives, so a downturn in shipbuilding demand hit a balance sheet that needed high utilisation.
  • Public concessions were tied to jobs and investment that did not fully materialise: FIRB said HHIC-Phil failed to keep 20,000 workers and abandoned a $2 billion Mindanao shipyard.
  • Five Philippine banks were left with $412 million in loans when rehabilitation began, while Korean lenders were owed another $900 million.
  • The state had already spent P370 million in 2015 foregone income-tax revenue and P5.17 billion in power subsidies over 2009–2018.
What it cost$1.3B owed to banks; P5.54B in public concessionscostly

The lesson

Do not grant or accept long incentive packages on promises that only work at full capacity. If jobs and debt service need a hot global order book, the subsidy is underwriting the cycle.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →