Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Strategy & Leadership · Strategic decision · 2018–2026

Condé Nast cut Glamour to a skeleton crew a year shy of its centennial

33 union editorial staff gone in five months, EIC Samantha Barry out, Self dead — the US masthead enters 2026 on what the union calls life support.

Glamour · Condé Nast · 2026-04

What happened

Glamour had been one of Condé Nast's American women's titles for nearly a century, and under editor-in-chief Samantha Barry — eight years in the role — it had run its digital pivot. On April 16, 2026, chief executive Roger Lynch published a memo: Self magazine would close entirely after 47 years, Glamour's editions in Germany, Spain and Mexico would shut, and content production would shift toward lower-cost hubs in India. Hours later Barry announced she was leaving: 'As the title's business model evolved, I made clear to Anna and leadership at Condé that this was the right moment to leave.'

The memo landed on top of five months of cuts. By April 22, 2026, the Condé Union said 33 union editorial staff had been lost across the company — the latest round alone cutting 16 people across Glamour, Self and Condé Nast Entertainment. 'Management would rather pocket the savings from terminating our members — and letting years of experience, talent and hard work walk out the door — than protect the brands they say they care so much about,' the union said. Some staff were given 'the choice between a demotion or a layoff' by a company claiming to exceed its revenue and profitability budgets.

What remained was what the union called life support. 'Most of the editorial staff is gone, as well as key staff in design, audience development, and operations,' it reported. 'It's hard to imagine how Glamour will continue to exist as the women's magazine with a nearly 100-year history of cultural relevancy and so few left to create its content.' Lynch's framing: 'None of these are easy decisions, nor are they a reflection of the quality of the work. These choices reflect how we are aligning both our brands and our technology organization to where we see the strongest opportunities ahead.'

Why it happened

  • The cuts landed while the company claimed to be exceeding its revenue and profitability budgets — the union argued the savings were pocketed rather than put back into the brands.
  • One memo closed Self, three international Glamour editions and moved production toward lower-cost hubs in India, leaving the US masthead with skeleton-crew capacity.
  • The editor-in-chief left hours after the memo, saying the title's business model had evolved — the signal that the masthead's role inside the company had changed faster than the brand.
What it cost33 editorial staff in 5 months; EIC gonecostly

The lesson

A masthead can survive every pivot and still die of cuts — the brand keeps its name while the people who made it walk out the door.

Aftermath

Barry left to pursue new projects, saying storytelling 'has always been at the heart of my career'; Self's health and wellness coverage was folded into Allure and Glamour, and the US masthead continued with what its own union called a skeleton crew — a year out from its centennial.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →