Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2022

Fashion Nova suppressed its bad reviews — the FTC's first such case cost $4.2M

For four years Fashion Nova auto-posted its 4- and 5-star reviews and quietly buried the rest. The FTC's first review-suppression case cost it $4.2 million.

Fashion Nova · 2022-01-25

What happened

From late 2015 to November 2019, Fashion Nova used a third-party review tool configured so that four- and five-star reviews were posted to its site automatically while any review below four stars was held for the company's approval. The approvals never came; hundreds of thousands of negative reviews were simply never published, so shoppers saw a wall of praise.

On January 25, 2022, the FTC announced the first action of its kind against review suppression, settling for $4.2 million — at the time the largest penalty for the practice. 'Deceptive review practices cheat consumers, undercut honest businesses, and pollute online commerce,' said Samuel Levine, director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection. 'Fashion Nova is being held accountable for these practices, and other firms should take note.'

Fashion Nova denied the allegations, calling them 'inaccurate and deceptive,' insisting it had never suppressed reviews, and saying it settled 'to avoid the distraction and legal fees' of litigation — a case it claimed it 'would have won in court.' The denial did not change the order: the company must stop suppressing reviews and the money goes to affected shoppers.

Why it happened

  • The suppression was a setting, not a scheme: the review tool's default behavior did the lying automatically for four years.
  • The site presented curated praise as the judgment of its customers, which is the entire value of a review section.
  • The FTC chose the case to draw a line: reviews are consumer currency, and faking their distribution is as deceptive as faking the review itself.
  • Fashion Nova's denial turned a settlement into a stance, making the case a named precedent rather than a quiet fine.
What it cost$4.2M — the FTC's first review-suppression penaltycostly

The lesson

If your review pipeline filters out the bad ratings, the ratings you show are a sales claim, and regulators can price it like one. The setting is the deception, not the intent.

Aftermath

The settlement put every retailer on notice that review suppression is an advertising practice the FTC will police. Fashion Nova continues to operate; the case remains the reference point for review-integrity enforcement and the company's denial became part of its story.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →