The encyclopedia · Engineering & Operations · Strategic decision · 2000–2001
Ericsson's single-sourcing bet: one plant fire killed the mobile phone business
A single Philips chip plant in Albuquerque caught fire in 2000. Ericsson had no backup. The disruption cost SEK 24B and ended its handset business.
Ericsson · Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson · Philips · Nokia · 2000-03-17
What happened
On March 17, 2000, a lightning strike ignited a fire at Philips' semiconductor plant number 82 in Albuquerque, New Mexico, contaminating the sterile cleanroom. The plant was a critical source of radio-frequency chips used in mobile phones, and two of its biggest customers were the Swedish telecom giant Ericsson and the Finnish rival Nokia. What happened next became the defining case study of supply chain concentration risk.
Nokia detected the disruption within days. It sent a team to Albuquerque within 72 hours, pressed Philips for realistic recovery timelines, and when it became clear the plant would be idled for months, Nokia rapidly re-engineered its products to accept chips from alternative Philips facilities and other suppliers, including Japanese and American semiconductor makers. Nokia secured its supply chain and absorbed the disruption with minimal lost production.
Ericsson reacted slowly. Its procurement system did not flag the shortage for weeks. By the time Ericsson realised the severity, Nokia had already booked the world's alternative capacity. Ericsson had no backup — it had single-sourced from the Albuquerque plant to save cost. The result was a production halt that caused a SEK 24B loss in Ericsson's mobile phone unit in 2000. In October 2001, Ericsson spun off its handset business into a joint venture with Sony (Sony Ericsson), exiting the market it had created. Nokia's market share grew during the same period.
Why it happened
- Ericsson single-sourced a critical chip from one Philips plant in Albuquerque — no backup supplier, no buffer stock, no alternative qualification.
- Ericsson's procurement system was slow to detect the disruption: by the time it realised the fire was serious, Nokia had already secured the alternative supply.
- Philips initially told both companies the plant would be back online in weeks; Nokia independently verified the real timeline while Ericsson accepted the initial estimate.
- The SEK 24B mobile phone loss in 2000 forced Ericsson into a joint venture with Sony, ending its run as an independent handset maker.
The lesson
Single-sourcing a critical component is a bet against probability. The question is not whether disruption will come, but whether the company sees it in time — Nokia saw it weeks before Ericsson.
Sources
- The Guardian: Ericsson axes 17,000 jobs (2002, aftermath of the fire)
- Ericsson press release: Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications established today
- FT Press: The Fire That Changed an Industry
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Apple's China supply chain bet: one COVID lockdown stopped iPhone production
The Boeing 787 Dreamliner's lithium batteries caught fire — and the fleet was grounded
A NASA engineer's bathroom sink experiment accidentally created the Super Soaker
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.