The encyclopedia · Engineering & Operations · Technical decision · 2013
The Boeing 787 Dreamliner's lithium batteries caught fire — and the fleet was grounded
In January 2013, two 787 battery fires grounded the Dreamliner fleet for 3 months. Lithium-ion thermal runaway was a failure mode the certification missed.
Boeing · 2013-01
What happened
In January 2013, two Boeing 787 Dreamliners experienced lithium-ion battery fires within two weeks of each other — one in Boston and one in Japan. The fires were caused by thermal runaway in the batteries, a phenomenon where a cell overheats and triggers a chain reaction in adjacent cells.
The FAA grounded the entire 787 fleet — the first grounding of a new aircraft type in decades. Boeing spent three months redesigning the battery system, adding containment and venting features, before the fleet was cleared to fly again.
The investigation found that the battery design did not adequately account for the risk of thermal runaway, and that the certification process had not required sufficient testing for this failure mode. The case illustrated how a new technology (lithium-ion batteries in aviation) can introduce failure modes that the existing certification standards do not anticipate, and how the rush to be first with a new technology can outpace the safety analysis.
Why it happened
- The 787's lithium-ion batteries experienced thermal runaway, a failure mode not adequately tested.
- The certification process did not require sufficient testing for thermal runaway scenarios.
- Two battery fires within two weeks grounded the entire 787 fleet for 3 months.
- Boeing redesigned the battery system with containment and venting features.
The lesson
A new technology in a safety-critical system requires new failure analysis. The 787's batteries were certified to standards that didn't anticipate thermal runaway.
Aftermath
Boeing redesigned the 787 battery system and the fleet returned to service in April 2013. The FAA updated its certification requirements for lithium-ion batteries in aviation. The case influenced the development of battery safety standards for electric aircraft.
Sources
- Boeing 787 Dreamliner battery problems — Wikipedia
- NTSB Investigation: Boeing 787 Battery Fire (DCA13IA037)
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Apple's China supply chain bet: one COVID lockdown stopped iPhone production
Boeing's Starliner went up for eight days — it came home empty, nine months later
Boeing outsourced 70% of the 787 Dreamliner — and lost control of its own airplane
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.