Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2019

The Bettina ad: R$1,520 to R$1M in three years — Procon called it misleading

March 2019: Empiricus's viral ad claimed a 22-year-old turned R$1,520 into R$1M in three years. Procon-SP fined the 'testimonial' as misleading advertising.

Empiricus · 2019-03

What happened

In March 2019 the Brazilian financial publisher Empiricus ran a video ad featuring Bettina Rudolph, its 22-year-old employee: she had started investing at 19 with R$ 1,520 and 'three years later I have more than R$ 1 million' — adding 'os resultados, eu garanto, serão os mesmos': the results, I guarantee, will be the same. Presented as a spontaneous testimonial with no advertising label, the video went viral, became the meme of the month — and drew a formal notification from Procon-SP.

Procon-SP ruled the ad misleading under article 37 of the Consumer Protection Code: a guarantee of results in the variable stock market was 'enganosa e capaz de induzir o consumidor a erro' — deceptive and capable of leading consumers into error. On 25 March it also filed a criminal representation with São Paulo's civil police. CONAR, the advertising self-regulator, ordered the ad suspended, and the CVM securities regulator and the Ministério Público opened investigations. On 5 April Procon fined Empiricus R$ 58.2 thousand.

Empiricus defended the piece as a teaser for a free financial-education course produced by 'a diligent team of 32 specialists', and insisted the story was real. It was not enough: 'Bettina' remains Brazil's shorthand for financial-ad hype, and the case is taught as the textbook false-advertising finding — testimonial format plus promised returns plus no ad label.

Why it happened

  • A testimonial promising 'the same results' in the variable stock market is a guaranteed-return claim — and guarantees are exactly what equities cannot offer.
  • The ad ran without an 'informe publicitário' label, so it read as a real story, not advertising; the disguise was part of the violation.
  • Virality turned compliance into a national debate: millions of shares brought Procon, CONAR, the CVM and the police to the same video within two weeks.
What it costR$ 58.2k fine; ad suspended; police inquiryembarrassing

The lesson

Testimonial ads carry two duties: disclose that they are ads, and never promise results the product cannot guarantee. The more viral the story, the faster the regulators arrive.

Aftermath

Bettina Rudolph became Brazil's meme of 2019 and a lasting shorthand for financial hype. Empiricus kept publishing, but the ruling entered consumer-law teaching as the example of a testimonial crossing into misleading advertising — and 'Bettina' still names the pattern whenever a get-rich video goes viral.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →