The encyclopedia · Strategy & Leadership · Strategic decision · 1965–2025
Ungaro was Paris fashion royalty — then an internet entrepreneur bought it for $84M
Ungaro was sold to Asim Abdullah for $84M in 2005. What followed was a revolving door of designers and the disastrous Lindsay Lohan episode.
Emanuel Ungaro · Asim Abdullah · Aeffe · 2005
What happened
Emanuel Ungaro founded his Paris fashion house in 1965 after training at Balenciaga and Courrèges. His bold prints, vibrant colours, and feminine silhouettes made him one of the most influential designers of the 1970s and 1980s. By 1989 the house produced multiple collections and diffusion lines, and for 30 years it remained the last major independent couturier in Paris.
In 1996, Ungaro sold a stake to Salvatore Ferragamo. Giambattista Valli revitalised the house as creative director from 1998 to 2004. When Ungaro retired in 2005, Ferragamo sold the label to internet entrepreneur Asim Abdullah for $84 million. The price reflected the brand's faded value — the peak was behind it.
What followed was a revolving door of creative directors and a spectacular misstep. In 2009, the brand appointed actress Lindsay Lohan as 'artistic advisor' — a move widely ridiculed in the fashion industry and seen as a desperate grasp for relevance. The runway collection lost money every year. Designer after designer came and went: Vincent Darré, Peter Dundas, Esteban Cortazar, Giles Deacon, Fausto Puglisi. By 2012, Aeffe took over production and distribution. In 2025, stylist Law Roach was reported preparing to buy the house from Abdullah.
Why it happened
- The sale to Asim Abdullah brought no fashion experience — an internet entrepreneur with no luxury background could not provide the leadership a struggling fashion house needed.
- The revolving door of seven creative directors in twenty years meant the brand had no consistent identity — each designer redefined Ungaro differently and customers had no reason to stay loyal.
- The Lindsay Lohan appointment in 2009 was not just a failure but an embarrassment — it signalled the brand had given up fashion credibility for cheap publicity, repelling serious designers.
- The $84M sale valued the brand on its history rather than its future — once the founder retired, there was no creative engine left, only a name that each new owner tried and failed to revive.
The lesson
A house with no creative director who understands it is just a trademark. Ungaro survived Ferragamo but could not survive an internet entrepreneur who treated couture like a software acquisition.
Aftermath
Emanuel Ungaro's label continues to exist but its relevance is a fraction of what it was. Aeffe manages production and distribution. The brand has had more creative directors in twenty years than it had in its first thirty. None of them has restored the house to anything approaching its former stature. In 2025, stylist Law Roach was reported to be preparing an offer to buy the label from Abdullah, suggesting that even after two decades the brand had not found an owner who knew what to do with it.
Sources
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Kering closed 200+ stores as Gucci's sales slump pulled the group's profit down 93%
Didier Ludot shut his 50-year Paris vintage couture boutique
Y/Project, Paris's cult avant-garde label, shut down after losing both founders
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →
Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.