In September 2014, Electrolux agreed to pay $3.3 billion in cash for General Electric's appliance business — its largest acquisition ever, and a deal that would have leapfrogged Whirlpool as the world's biggest appliance maker. GE was selling because Jeff Immelt was refocusing GE on industrial equipment; Electrolux was buying scale in North America, where it sells under Frigidaire and Kenmore.

The Justice Department sued at the end of June 2015 to block the deal in federal court in Washington. Its case was narrow and concrete: in the 'contract channel' — freestanding cooking appliances sold to homebuilders, property managers, hotels and governments — Electrolux, GE and Whirlpool already made about 90 percent of US sales, and the department told the court the deal would push prices up around five percent. Electrolux answered with the whole market: Samsung and LG had taken roughly 20 percent of large appliances from almost nothing a decade earlier.

Electrolux offered divestitures to settle; the DOJ rejected the proposals. While the court case was still pending, GE terminated the agreement on December 7, 2015 — and requested the $175 million termination fee the contract promised it. Analysts expected Electrolux shares to fall at least 10 percent. On January 11, 2016 CEO Keith McLoughlin announced his retirement; on January 15 GE agreed to sell the appliance business to China's Haier for $5.4 billion.

$3.3B acquisition dead; $175M termination fee paid to GE; CEO Keith McLoughlin retired four weeks after the collapse

The real overlap was one channel: freestanding cooking appliances sold to builders and property managers, where Electrolux, GE and Whirlpool already made about 90 percent of US sales.

Electrolux priced regulatory risk as a routine divestiture package — but the DOJ rejected its settlement proposals, so the remedy plan was never big enough to matter.

The defense argued from the whole industry, where Samsung and LG had reached about 20 percent of large appliances; the case was tried on the cooking segment, where those entrants were barely present.

The merger agreement put a $175 million fee on exactly this outcome, and GE — mid-restructuring under Immelt — took the money instead of fighting for a lower price or a court win.

Regulators judge a merger on the market in front of them, not the buyer's industry-wide story. Price the walk-away — fee, costs, strategy reset — before you sign, not after the injunction.

McLoughlin handed over to Jonas Samuelson on February 1, 2016, one month after the deal collapsed. Four days after the retirement announcement, GE agreed to sell the appliance unit to Haier for $5.4 billion — roughly $2 billion more than Electrolux had agreed to pay, paid by a buyer the DOJ had no objection to. Electrolux kept its strategy unchanged and said its North America business was growing well organically, but its decade-long push to become the world's largest appliance maker ended in a $175 million fee.

FOLLOW THE EVIDENCE

The sources

  1. Feds block Electrolux's $3.3B deal for GE appliance biz cbsnews.com
  2. Electrolux's S$4.6 billion acquisition of GE Appliances falls through straitstimes.com
  3. Electrolux CEO to Step Down After Failed Deal with GE fortune.com
  4. GE to Sell Appliance Business to China's Haier for $5.4 Billion fortune.com