The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2026
eDreams Prime pushed fake discounts and blocked exits — Italy fined it €9M
Fake countdowns, preselected tiers, instant charges on 'free' trials and no way out: AGCM called them dark patterns and fined the eDreams group €9M.
eDreams · 2026-02-04
What happened
eDreams sells eDreams Prime, a subscription promising discounts on flights and hotels, with tiers including Prime Plus and a free trial. Italy's competition authority found the enrollment funnel was built on dark patterns: countdown timers and artificial scarcity to rush the decision, exaggerated claims of the discounts' value, and pre-selection of the most expensive tier.
Users who were not eligible for the free trial were charged the annual fee immediately, without adequate notice. Getting out was harder than getting in: AGCM found a deliberate strategy to obstruct withdrawal and cancellation both before the trial expired and during the subscription, with retention scripts run through customer service.
On 4 February 2026 AGCM fined the three eDreams group companies €9M in total — €6M for misleading and aggressive enrollment practices, €3M for aggressive practices blocking the right of withdrawal — under articles 20–26 of the Italian Consumer Code. The case (PS12853) followed complaints by consumer associations, including Federconsumatori, which had flagged the Prime package for years.
Why it happened
- The interface did the selling: countdowns, scarcity cues and a preselected top tier manufactured consent instead of informing it.
- Charging ineligible users the annual fee at once turned a 'free trial' promise into a billing event the customer never agreed to.
- Retention became obstruction — cancellation was routed through scripts designed to keep subscribers, which made exit itself an aggressive practice.
- Discount values were presented without the transparency to check them, so the subscription's selling point could not be verified by the buyer.
The lesson
Dark patterns now carry a price tag: fake scarcity to enroll and blocked exits to retain cost eDreams €9M in Italy. Design the unsubscribe like the subscribe.
Aftermath
AGCM's PS12853 decision named dark patterns — deceptive interface design exploiting cognitive biases — as the mechanism of the violation, one of the larger European fines framed that way. Consumer associations welcomed it and pressed for refunds; the decision stands as a template other EU authorities can follow against subscription funnels that trap.
Sources
- AGCM press release: €9M sanction on eDreams for unfair commercial practices (PS12853, 4 February 2026)
- QuiFinanza: eDreams fined €9M by the Antitrust for deceptive practices
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Supor's own storefront posted AI ads of a man walking in on a woman showering
Livestreamer Xu Jingwan (许静婉) hid income in private accounts and lost ¥6.3m to fines
Temu's 'up to 95% off' was built on crossed-out prices that never were
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.