The encyclopedia · Trading & Investing · Financial decision · 2008
COSCO lost $570M on freight derivatives — a shipping giant's own bet
China's COSCO lost $570M in 2008 on freight derivatives — betting on rising shipping rates, just as the global financial crisis collapsed demand.
COSCO Shipping · 2008-10
What happened
COSCO (China Ocean Shipping Company) was one of the world's largest shipping companies, operating a massive fleet of container ships and bulk carriers. In 2008, the company entered into freight forward agreements (FFAs) — derivatives contracts that allowed it to bet on the future direction of shipping rates.
COSCO's treasury took large long positions in FFAs, betting that shipping rates would continue to rise as they had during the global shipping boom of the early 2000s. The company was not just hedging its exposure to shipping rates — it was speculating that rates would go much higher.
When the global financial crisis hit in late 2008, international trade collapsed and shipping rates plunged. The Baltic Dry Index, which measures shipping costs for bulk goods, fell by 94% from its peak. COSCO's FFA positions went from profitable to catastrophic, resulting in losses of $570 million.
The loss was one of the largest derivative losses by a Chinese state-owned enterprise. It forced COSCO to report its first annual loss in years and led to tighter controls on derivative trading by Chinese SOEs. The case highlighted how even companies that should understand their industry can make catastrophic speculative bets on it.
Why it happened
- COSCO used freight derivatives to speculate on rising shipping rates, not to hedge — a bet that the shipping boom would continue forever, which no cycle ever does.
- The 2008 financial crisis caused a 94% collapse in shipping rates, an unprecedented drop that the company's models had not contemplated.
- COSCO's positions were large enough that the loss was material to the entire company, demonstrating that the company had no risk limits on its derivative trading.
The lesson
A shipping company betting on shipping rates is still a speculative bet. COSCO lost $570M learning that the Baltic Dry Index can fall 94% faster than anyone expects.
Sources
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
A ¥6.3B rescue couldn't stop a ¥23.7B writedown at China's mall giant
Gome's founder surrendered the company to a creditor for HK$377M
A 90-year-old department store has ¥137M cash against ¥3.9B of short-term debt
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.