Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Finance & Accounting · Financial decision · 2005–2015

Comercial Mexicana's treasury turned a hedge into a casino — the bet cost $1,080m

A supermarket treasury that hedged dollar debt since 1994 signed more than 150 speculative contracts with one hedge. When the peso fell in 2008 it lost $1,080m.

Comercial Mexicana · Soriana

HearsayWidely repeated, and we cannot show you a document for it. Read it for the lesson, not as fact.

What it means today

Any treasury running derivatives: count how many contracts hedge an exposure and how many express a view. If the second number grows, the hedge program has become a trading book — and a board order to close positions that nobody verifies comes too late.

What happened

Comercial Mexicana, one of Mexico's largest supermarket chains, began using derivatives in 1994 to hedge dollar debt — protecting a third of a $300m loan after the peso crisis — and widened the program in 1998 with a second dollar bond. For a decade the desk hedged. Then, between November 2005 and September 2008, the company signed more than 150 derivative contracts with its banks — and only one of them was a hedge. The rest were TARNs, target-accrual notes the trade press called casino chips: a cheap way in, a bet on the peso staying calm, and losses that could outgrow any possible gain.

Losses climbed through 2008 — $100m, $400m, $600m, $700m — while the board asked on 15 July, on risk-committee advice, to cancel the speculative contracts; most positions stayed open. The treasury doubled down, signing new TARNs at worse rates — the gambler's mentality, the telling calls it: double or nothing. Some July–September trades were made without the board's knowledge, per the company's own lawyer. After Lehman fell the peso dropped, and the desk held open positions to buy $7bn. The recognized loss was $1,080m; the banks claimed over $2,000m and the company acknowledged $1,010m of it.

On 9 October 2008 the board filed concurso mercantil for the holding company — the stores kept trading. The restructuring closed on 10 December 2010: 100 percent of liabilities reorganized into 19,247 million pesos of new instruments plus a 45-million-dollar cash payment, with 88 percent of bondholders aboard. To pay, Comerci sold its Costco México stake. In January 2015 it agreed to sell Soriana 160 stores — its four main formats — for 39,194 million pesos, keeping only 40 premium stores. Learning from its own bad experience, the new company would hold no financial derivatives of any kind.

Why it happened

  • The hedge drifted into speculation one contract at a time: more than 150 contracts signed in three years, and only one of them hedged anything.
  • When the board ordered speculative positions closed in July 2008, most stayed open — and the treasury doubled down, signing new TARNs at worse rates: double or nothing.
  • The controls were thin: some July–September trades were made without the board's knowledge, and the true size of the exposure stayed inside one desk until the peso moved.
What it costa $1,080m loss and most of a national supermarket chaincostly

The lesson

A hedge protects an exposure; a position expresses a view. Comerci signed more than 150 contracts and one was a hedge — the rest were a bet that the peso would behave, made by a desk nobody watched.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →