Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Engineering & Operations · Technical decision · 1978

A student's question exposed a wind flaw in the Citicorp Tower

In 1978, a student asked about the Citicorp Tower's design. The engineer found a fatal wind flaw. The fix was welded in secret at night.

Citibank · LeMessurier Consultants · 1978-06

What happened

In 1978, a Princeton engineering student named Diane Hartley called the offices of William LeMessurier, the structural engineer of the Citicorp Center tower in Manhattan, to ask about the building's unusual design: four columns at the center of each face rather than at the corners.

Hartley's question prompted LeMessurier to re-examine his calculations. He discovered a critical flaw: the building's tuned mass damper and bolted joints were not designed to withstand quartering winds (winds hitting the building at a 45-degree angle). A sufficiently strong storm could cause the building to collapse.

LeMessurier faced a dilemma: disclosing the flaw publicly could cause panic and a financial crisis for Citibank. He chose to inform Citibank and the city, and the repair was carried out secretly at night over several weeks, with welders reinforcing the bolted joints. The case illustrated how a student's question can expose a flaw that the engineer's own calculations missed, and how the ethics of disclosure can conflict with the economics of panic.

Why it happened

  • A student's question prompted the engineer to re-examine his calculations.
  • The building's joints were not designed for quartering winds; a storm could cause collapse.
  • The repair was carried out secretly at night to avoid panic.
  • The case raised questions about engineering ethics and disclosure.
What it costsecret nighttime repairs; potential collapse avertedcostly

The lesson

A student's question can expose a flaw the engineer's calculations missed. LeMessurier's analysis didn't consider quartering winds. The fix was right; the secrecy was the compromise.

Aftermath

The Citicorp Center (now 601 Lexington Avenue) stands safely. LeMessurier's decision to disclose the flaw is taught as a model of engineering ethics. The case is cited in every engineering ethics course as an example of professional responsibility.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →