Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Strategy & Leadership · Financial decision · 1926–2002

Charles of the Ritz was a prestige beauty name — five owners made it worthless

Charles of the Ritz was born at the Ritz-Carlton in 1926 — by 2002 Revlon had killed it with downmarket repositioning and no buyer would take the name.

Charles of the Ritz · 2002

What happened

Charles of the Ritz was born in 1926 when Charles Jundt, a hairdresser working at the Ritz-Carlton Hotel in New York, created a prestige cosmetics line carrying the hotel's name. The brand grew into a major beauty house, launching iconic products like Jean Naté body splash, Enjoli perfume, and the Forever Krystle fragrance inspired by the TV drama Dynasty.

In 1971, pharmaceutical company E.R. Squibb & Sons bought the brand. Fifteen years later Squibb sold the division to Yves Saint Laurent for $500 million. YSL invested heavily in a new men's fragrance, Jazz, which failed — and the October 1987 stock market crash erased any hope of recovery.

YSL sold Charles of the Ritz to Revlon later in 1987, but Revlon treated it as a back-burner brand. The company repositioned it for mid-price stores like J.C. Penney and targeted 'mature' customers — a death sentence for a name built on Ritz-Carlton prestige. Attempts to revive the brand with celebrity endorsements failed, and when Revlon tried to sell the line, no buyer wanted it. Analysts noted that the name 'Charles of the Ritz' no longer meant anything to consumers.

In 2002, Revlon discontinued Charles of the Ritz. The fragrances lived on under the Revlon name — stripped of their own identity, selling without the history that had once made them desirable.

Why it happened

  • Each owner repositioned the brand further downmarket — from Ritz-Carlton to J.C. Penney — destroying the prestige that was the brand's only asset.
  • YSL paid $500 million and bet on one fragrance (Jazz) that failed — the 1987 crash left them with no time or money to fix the strategy.
  • Revlon acquired the brand while overloaded with other beauty acquisitions (Max Factor, Almay, Halston) — Charles of the Ritz was never a priority and never got the investment it needed.
  • By the time Revlon wanted to sell, decades of neglect had erased consumer recognition of the name — there was nothing left to buy.
What it cost2002: discontinued; no buyer found; brand value destroyedcostly

The lesson

A prestige brand's value is its name and what that name means. Charles of the Ritz had every owner push it one notch cheaper — until the name meant nothing and no one would pay for it.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →