Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Strategy & Leadership · Operational decision · 2001–2015

Cash Box ruled Beijing KTV for a decade — one store left of four

Cash Box ran four Beijing KTV megastores at its peak; after the 2015 closure of its flagship Chaoyang store, only the Huixin Xijie location remained.

Cash Box · 钱柜 · 2015-02

What happened

钱柜 (Cash Box) entered Beijing in 2001 and defined the city's KTV era: megastores with private rooms and all-you-can-eat buffets, four Beijing locations at its peak — Chaoyang, Huixin Xijie, Shouti and Yonghegong — and eighteen across the country. In its best years the Chaoyang flagship drew 700,000 to 800,000 visits a month.

The turn came with a 2008 change of management model: the chain dropped the buffet that had been its signature. 'The buffet was removed, but business has been declining ever since,' executive general manager Wang Quan admitted. Chaoyang's footfall slid to 200,000–300,000 visits a month, while rent rose more than 30 percent in a few years and labour costs more than tripled.

Group-buying apps were meanwhile selling KTV rooms at deep discounts, and the megastore model stopped paying. The Shouti and Yonghegong stores closed within two years; on 1 February 2015 the Chaoyang flagship's lease expired and was not renewed. One store of four remained in Beijing.

Why it happened

  • Cutting the buffet in 2008 removed the experience customers came for, and traffic fell from then on.
  • Rent up more than 30% and labour costs more than tripled against a fixed premium-price model.
  • Group-buying apps sold KTV rooms cheaply; a premium megastore could not justify its prices.
What it costflagship lost; 3 of 4 Beijing storescostly

The lesson

钱柜 cut the buffet that defined it in 2008 and traffic declined ever after; when the lease expired in 2015, Beijing's defining KTV chain kept one store of four.

Aftermath

The Huixin Xijie store carried on alone, and China's KTV centre of gravity moved to app-booked rooms and mini KTV booths.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →