Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Strategy & Leadership · Strategic decision · 2011–2014

Burberry Beauty launched in Korea with fanfare in 2011 — it was gone by 2014

Burberry Beauty opened its first Korea store in Nov 2011. Two years later, only one counter remained and the importer was preparing to shutter the brand.

Burberry · Hicos · 2014-01

What happened

Burberry Beauty, the cosmetic and fragrance division of the British luxury house Burberry, launched in South Korea in November 2011 with a flagship counter at Lotte Department Store's Jamsil branch. The launch was met with fanfare — Koreans had long been obsessed with Burberry's signature tartan pattern, and the brand seemed poised for success in one of the world's most competitive beauty markets.

The optimism was short-lived. Over the next two years, Burberry Beauty managed to open only two additional stores — one in Daejeon and one in Sogong-dong, Seoul. By December 2013, the Daejeon store had closed. By January 2014, only a single counter remained at Lotte Department Store in downtown Seoul. Hicos, Burberry Beauty's Korean importer and distributor, was preparing to shutter the brand entirely.

The collapse was visible in the brand's pricing behaviour. Burberry Beauty had once been notorious for refusing discounts, insisting that promotions were beneath its luxury positioning. But in its final months in Korea, the brand was offering buy-one-get-one-free campaigns and selling products at 80% off at employee family sales — a dramatic reversal that signalled a brand in distress.

Industry sources cited multiple causes: anemic sales for more than two years, declining brand power, criticism over overpricing, direct online purchases eroding margins, and a saturated market where trends moved at breakneck speed. The parent Burberry fashion division's operating profit had fallen nearly 40% between April 2012 and March 2013, compounding the beauty line's struggles. Burberry Beauty's exit was part of a broader wave — Avon had withdrawn from Korea in early 2013, and Helena Rubinstein and Givenchy had reduced their presence to duty-free shops only.

Why it happened

  • Burberry Beauty launched in Korea just as the parent fashion brand was losing steam — operating profit fell nearly 40% in the year after the beauty line's launch, leaving no corporate support
  • Only 3 stores in 2 years could never generate the volume to cover the costs of a luxury department-store presence in Korea
  • BOGO and 80%-off discounts within two years destroyed the premium positioning that justified luxury pricing, a death spiral of lower margins and lower brand perception
  • Korea's saturated beauty market moved too fast for a brand that did not invest in regular product refreshes or new launches
What it cost3 stores closed; brand exited Korea within 2 yearscostly

The lesson

A luxury name alone is not enough in Korea's beauty market. Two years of anemic sales proved that brand recognition without sustained local investment is a short-lived asset.

Aftermath

Burberry Beauty exited Korea entirely in early 2014. The brand continued to operate in other markets globally. The Korea Herald noted that Burberry was not alone — Avon had withdrawn from Korea in early 2013, and Helena Rubinstein and Givenchy had reduced their Korean presence to duty-free channels only.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →