The encyclopedia · Finance & Accounting · Financial decision · 2011–2014
Bevilles kept 27 large stores through three losing years — landlords blocked its rescue
An 80-year-old family jeweller's smaller-store idea worked in two pilots, but landlords refused to shrink the rest — then came $12.3m of losses.
Bevilles · 2014-04
What happened
Bevilles was an 80-year-old, family-owned Australian jewellery group founded by Michelle Beville's grandparents, running 27 stores across Melbourne, Sydney and Adelaide with 477 staff. In early 2013 it launched an extensive rebrand: drop giftware, shrink store footprints, and sell jewellery and watches only. Two pilot stores — Highpoint in Melbourne, opened October, and Westfield Liverpool in Sydney — showed the format worked.
On 1 April 2014 the group was placed in voluntary administration with PPB Advisory. Trading losses had exceeded $12.3 million since July 2011, including $3.57 million in the current financial year; sales had fallen from $83.5 million to $71.9 million, and total liabilities stood at about $14 million. The administrators' report cited continuing losses, overdue taxes and poor creditor relations — and the strategic cause: landlords refused to allow the chain to re-engineer around smaller, fewer stores, so the proven new format could not be rolled out fast enough to stop the bleed.
The Beville family reacquired the business through a new entity, Bevilles Corp, buying 16 stores and retaining 237 staff under a deed of company arrangement voted on 11 May. Eight stores closed immediately and three more by 30 June. The surviving chain converted to roughly 90-square-metre jewellery-only stores — the same format its landlords had refused to make room for.
Why it happened
- The chain kept 27 large-format stores — 150 to 180 square metres of jewellery and giftware — while discounters cut giftware prices and margins, and sales fell from $83.5m to $71.9m over three years.
- The 2013 turnaround to smaller jewellery-only stores was proven in two pilots, but landlords refused the lease changes that would have let the chain downsize quickly, so the losses kept running.
- PPB's report also listed overdue taxes, poor relations with creditors on extended trading terms, and special arrangements with selected creditors — the business was carried on stretched terms.
- The rescue plan depended on landlord cooperation that was never secured in advance; the rebrand launched before the leases behind it did.
The lesson
A turnaround that needs landlord consent is hostage to the lease. Bevilles proved its smaller format in two pilots, but could not shrink the rest without lease changes — so it collapsed to be rebuilt.
Aftermath
Bevilles Corp relaunched the smaller-format chain in 2014 and traded on under the family; the business was later sold to Michael Hill in 2023.
Sources
- Inside Retail — Bevilles collapses
- Inside Retail — Bevilles re-engineered
- Inside Retail — From administration to $65m acquisition: Behind Bevilles' turnaround
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
The Ringmaker went broke trading bespoke ring orders it couldn't finish
Jeanswest dressed Australia for 53 years — then closed every store in one administration
Mosaic Brands bought 11 fashion chains targeting the same customer — and buried them all
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.