Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Finance & Accounting · Financial decision · 2011–2014

Bevilles kept 27 large stores through three losing years — landlords blocked its rescue

An 80-year-old family jeweller's smaller-store idea worked in two pilots, but landlords refused to shrink the rest — then came $12.3m of losses.

Bevilles · 2014-04

What happened

Bevilles was an 80-year-old, family-owned Australian jewellery group founded by Michelle Beville's grandparents, running 27 stores across Melbourne, Sydney and Adelaide with 477 staff. In early 2013 it launched an extensive rebrand: drop giftware, shrink store footprints, and sell jewellery and watches only. Two pilot stores — Highpoint in Melbourne, opened October, and Westfield Liverpool in Sydney — showed the format worked.

On 1 April 2014 the group was placed in voluntary administration with PPB Advisory. Trading losses had exceeded $12.3 million since July 2011, including $3.57 million in the current financial year; sales had fallen from $83.5 million to $71.9 million, and total liabilities stood at about $14 million. The administrators' report cited continuing losses, overdue taxes and poor creditor relations — and the strategic cause: landlords refused to allow the chain to re-engineer around smaller, fewer stores, so the proven new format could not be rolled out fast enough to stop the bleed.

The Beville family reacquired the business through a new entity, Bevilles Corp, buying 16 stores and retaining 237 staff under a deed of company arrangement voted on 11 May. Eight stores closed immediately and three more by 30 June. The surviving chain converted to roughly 90-square-metre jewellery-only stores — the same format its landlords had refused to make room for.

Why it happened

  • The chain kept 27 large-format stores — 150 to 180 square metres of jewellery and giftware — while discounters cut giftware prices and margins, and sales fell from $83.5m to $71.9m over three years.
  • The 2013 turnaround to smaller jewellery-only stores was proven in two pilots, but landlords refused the lease changes that would have let the chain downsize quickly, so the losses kept running.
  • PPB's report also listed overdue taxes, poor relations with creditors on extended trading terms, and special arrangements with selected creditors — the business was carried on stretched terms.
  • The rescue plan depended on landlord cooperation that was never secured in advance; the rebrand launched before the leases behind it did.
What it cost11 of 27 stores closed, ~240 jobs lost, ~$14m liabilitiescostly

The lesson

A turnaround that needs landlord consent is hostage to the lease. Bevilles proved its smaller format in two pilots, but could not shrink the rest without lease changes — so it collapsed to be rebuilt.

Aftermath

Bevilles Corp relaunched the smaller-format chain in 2014 and traded on under the family; the business was later sold to Michael Hill in 2023.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →