Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Marketing & Brand · Marketing decision · 2026

Bench brought back Kim Soo-hyun after his scandal — and faced a backlash

The Philippine fashion brand was the first to give Kim Soo-hyun a public platform after his controversy, and was met with angry calls to drop him.

Bench · 2026-06-08

What happened

In March 2025, South Korean actor Kim Soo-hyun was accused in a dating scandal involving the late actress Kim Sae-ron. Brands including Prada, Eider, and Dinto immediately ended their partnerships. Kim Soo-hyun withdrew from public life for over a year, and his career was widely considered over. After a police investigation cleared him of criminal wrongdoing in May 2026, a cautious return began — but most brands stayed away, waiting to see whether public sentiment would recover.

Bench, the Philippine fashion brand that had partnered with Kim Soo-hyun before the scandal, was the first to give him a public platform again. On June 8, 2026, Bench confirmed a new campaign with a photoshoot scheduled for July 14. The announcement was met with immediate backlash: Philippine netizens called for a boycott, accusing Bench of enabling a public figure who had faced serious allegations. Comments on Bench's social media posts demanded the brand drop him, and the controversy trended on local platforms.

Bench proceeded with the campaign anyway, completing the photoshoot on schedule. The brand issued no public statement addressing the backlash. The decision became a case study in the trade-off between loyalty to a long-term partner and responsiveness to public sentiment — especially when the partner's controversy involved allegations that resonated emotionally with the brand's audience.

Why it happened

  • Bench bet that legal clearance would restore public trust, but legal clearance and public forgiveness are different things — especially in a market where the allegations were widely followed
  • By responding with silence rather than a statement, Bench let the backlash define the narrative instead of shaping it — the controversy became the story of the campaign launch
  • The brand underestimated how differently the scandal was perceived in the Philippines versus Korea — what was a 'resolved legal matter' in one market was still an emotional controversy in the other
What it costbrand reputation damage; boycott calls; social media crisisembarrassing

The lesson

Legal clearance does not equal public forgiveness — a brand that brings back a controversial figure before the public has moved on becomes the story instead of the campaign

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →