Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Strategy & Leadership · Strategic decision · 2015–2017

BCBG owed nearly $460m — 'bon chic, bon genre' ended in Chapter 11

Feb 28, 2017: BCBG Max Azria filed Chapter 11 with up to $1bn in liabilities; 120 stores closed, and the founder had already lost his own company.

BCBG Max Azria · Hervé Léger · 2017-02

What happened

Max Azria founded BCBG Max Azria in 1989 — the name from 'bon chic, bon genre' — and built it into a mall-era fixture of aspirational-but-attainable dressing, buying Hervé Léger in 1998. By February 28, 2017, the company filed Chapter 11 in New York listing assets of $100–500 million against liabilities of $500 million to $1 billion; court papers put lender debt at nearly $460 million, with around $290 million more in junior claims. A $135 million cash infusion in 2015 had slowed nothing: brick-and-mortar retail sales had plunged 20 per cent over the three years before the filing.

The company named its causes itself. Restructuring officer Holly Felder Etlin wrote that BCBG 'has fallen victim in recent years to adverse macro-trends' — the shift from stores to online, where e-commerce was a small share, and a move away from branded apparel. Analyst Jessica Ramirez sharpened the point: 'At Zara, if I go in today, in the next two weeks they will have something new… Their Instagram, their online presence, even that looks outdated.' 120 stores were announced for closure that month, including all freestanding Canadian locations; Europe and Japan operations were consolidated.

The founder had already exited his own story. In August 2016, nine months before the filing, Max Azria lost his majority equity stake and stepped down as chief executive during a debt restructuring. What remained was a reorganization plan — six months to refocus on digital, wholesale and licensing under a $45 million financing commitment from existing lenders — and a name that once described a generation's idea of chic. The brand survived the bankruptcy; the company Azria built did not survive it in any form he controlled.

Why it happened

  • E-commerce stayed a small proportion of sales while the customer's attention moved online — the filing papers admitted the shift and the company's unreadiness together.
  • A monthly product calendar lost to Zara's two-week one; the speed gap was visible to shoppers and analysts alike before it reached the balance sheet.
  • The $135 million infusion of 2015 bought eighteen months, not a turnaround — the debt it serviced arrived in court with interest.
What it costup to $1bn in liabilities, 120 stores, the foundercostly

The lesson

A brand can name its own obsolescence in a court filing — BCBG's Chapter 11 papers listed e-commerce, fast fashion and demographics as causes the company had watched happen.

Aftermath

BCBG emerged from Chapter 11 as a smaller, licensing-and-wholesale-focused business; Max Azria did not return to the company that bore his name. The case joined the 2017 wave of mall-era contemporary brands — Bebe, The Limited, Wet Seal — that the digital transition swept away.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →