The encyclopedia · Legal & Compliance · Legal decision · 2018–2022
AMP charged customers for advice it never gave — and lied about it for years
Australia's oldest wealth manager billed clients for advice nobody provided — even the dead — until a royal commission exposed it.
AMP · 2018-04-17
What happened
AMP was Australia's oldest financial firm — founded in 1849, demutualised in 1998, the country's biggest wealth manager. For years its advice arm billed clients ongoing 'service' fees without providing any service: customers paid for annual reviews that never happened, and AMP later admitted it had charged more than 4,600 members who were dead. An internal complaint about premiums being deducted from dead customers' accounts had surfaced as early as 2016 and was never reported to regulators.
The cover-up was what broke it. When the corporate regulator ASIC asked AMP to explain its fees-for-no-service, AMP commissioned an 'independent' review from law firm Clayton Utz — then had its own executives redraft the report 25 times before handing it over. AMP also misled ASIC roughly 20 times over two years. In April 2018 the royal commission put AMP's head of advice, Anthony Regan, in the witness box; he admitted the firm had 'preferenced the interests of shareholders at the expense of clients' and protected profitability 'at the expense of complying with the law'.
The fallout was immediate. CEO Craig Meller resigned on 20 April 2018 — the inquiry's first scalp — and chairwoman Catherine Brenner followed ten days later; AMP cut directors' pay by 25% and its general counsel left. Shares fell more than 10% that week. By August, half-year net profit had plunged 74% to A$115 million and customers had pulled A$873 million out of its wealth management arm; more than A$1 billion of market value was stripped from the company during 2018.
The reckoning continued for years. On 25 October 2018, after AMP announced it would sell its life insurance arm to Resolution Life for A$3.3 billion and exit financial advice, shares crashed 24.5% to A$2.50 as investors deserted. The Federal Court fined AMP A$14.6 million in September 2022 after ASIC sued, and by August 2022 AMP had paid back A$627 million to 331,994 customers for services never delivered. The 169-year-old blue chip that had survived two world wars never recovered its standing.
Why it happened
- Recurring fees with no service attached were pure margin, so nobody stopped them: the billing ran on, and the first internal complaint about dead customers' premiums (2016) was never reported.
- The response was to manage the regulator, not fix the problem: an 'independent' Clayton Utz review redrafted 25 times, and ASIC misled about 20 times in two years.
- The culture prized profit over compliance: Regan admitted AMP protected profitability 'at the expense of complying with the law', and no one above him objected until an inquiry forced the issue.
- Systems charged on without checking whether the customer was even alive: 4,645 dead members were billed A$1.3 million in premiums before AMP looked.
The lesson
A fee billed without the service is a liability with a discovery date. AMP collected for years, misled its regulator when asked, and by 2022 had repaid A$627M — after A$1B of value had already left.
Sources
- The Guardian — Banking royal commission: AMP executive says company put profits before the law (2018-04-17)
- The Star — Wealth manager AMP's Meller quits as misconduct inquiry claims first scalp (2018-04-20)
- The Guardian — AMP chair Catherine Brenner resigns after scandals uncovered by banking commission (2018-04-30)
- The Guardian — AMP profits plunge 74% in wake of fees-for-no-service scandal (2018-08-08)
- The Guardian — AMP admits it kept charging more than 4,600 dead people for life insurance (2018-09-17)
- The Guardian — AMP loses nearly one-quarter of its value amid investor exodus (2018-10-25)
- Wikipedia — AMP Limited
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
A ¥6.3B rescue couldn't stop a ¥23.7B writedown at China's mall giant
Gome's founder surrendered the company to a creditor for HK$377M
A 90-year-old department store has ¥137M cash against ¥3.9B of short-term debt
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.