Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Legal & Compliance · Legal decision · 2001–2008

Payless sold two-stripe and four-stripe shoes — the jury said $305m

Sued in 2001 for stripe-look shoes; on May 7, 2008, a Portland jury awarded adidas $305m — likely the largest trademark verdict in US history then.

adidas · Payless ShoeSource · Collective Brands · 2008-05

What happened

The three stripes had been on adidas shoes since 1952 and were registered as a US trademark in 1994. Payless ShoeSource — the Topeka, Kansas discount chain owned by Collective Brands — sold low-priced athletic shoes carrying two parallel stripes, or four. Around the end of 2001, adidas sued Payless in federal court in Portland, Oregon, where its American business is based: trademark infringement and dilution over the stripe designs.

Payless's defence was arithmetic: its shoes carried two stripes or four, never three, so there was no infringement of the three-stripe mark. After six and a half years of litigation, the Portland jury disagreed. On May 7, 2008, it awarded adidas nearly $305 million — roughly $30 million in actual damages, $137 million of the profits Payless had made on the infringing shoes, and $137 million more in punitive damages.

Adidas trial lawyer Charlie Henn of Kilpatrick Stockton said the jury had 'sent a very clear message to companies that are engaged in the practice of selling knockoffs,' and called the award likely the largest in US trademark history. Collective Brands called the verdict 'excessive and unjustified' and promised to take 'all necessary steps to overturn it.' On the Frankfurt exchange, adidas shares closed up 5.7 per cent the day the news landed.

Why it happened

  • Two stripes or four was Payless's whole defence — the jury decided the number was beside the point when the message of the stripes was the same.
  • The award tripled itself: actual damages, disgorged profits and punitive damages each landed in eight figures.
  • Six and a half years of litigation turned a discount shoe line into one of trademark law's most expensive lessons.
What it cost$305m verdict — profits, damages and punitive doubled upcostly

The lesson

A trademark jury looks at what the stripes say, not how many there are — Payless counted its way to a $305 million verdict against it.

Aftermath

Collective Brands moved to have the verdict set aside and promised appeals; the judgment stood at the time as likely the largest trademark award in US history. Payless's later bankruptcies became the coda to the stripe wars.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →