案例库 · 广告与公关 · 市场决策 · 2023
这条还没译成中文,下面是英文原文。
Dufresne's countdown timers kept selling after zero — Canada fined it $3.25M
Sept 2023: The Dufresne Group paid Canada $3.25M — inflated regular prices dressed as discounts, and 'limited time' timers that never ended.
The Dufresne Group Inc. · 2023-09
怎么回事
The Dufresne Group runs furniture and appliance retail across Western Canada under the Dufresne Furniture and Appliances banner and certain Ashley HomeStores. The Bureau concluded its products carried inflated regular prices, then went out at big discounts advertised as significant savings — on the websites, in stores and across its advertising. The savings were not real; the anchor was.
The second deception was time itself. Dufresne marketed deals as limited-time offers with countdown clocks, creating the impression they would vanish at zero. In at least one instance the deal remained available after the timer expired. On 27 September 2023 TDG and its affiliates signed a consent agreement: a $3.25 million penalty plus $100,000 toward the Bureau's costs, compliant marketing practices and a corporate compliance program.
The case put a number on the countdown timer as a dark pattern: urgency that does not expire is a lie about scarcity. Commissioner Matthew Boswell's standard: tactics that pressure consumers to buy quickly, like limited-time offers, must be truthful.
为什么会这样
- The inflated regular price was an anchor chosen to be beaten, so every discount overstated the saving.
- A countdown clock says the deal dies at zero; when it doesn't, the timer is a false claim, not a deadline.
- The deception ran across websites, stores and ads — the anchor and the timer reinforced each other everywhere.
教训
Urgency is a claim: a limited-time offer must expire, and a discount must beat a real price. A countdown that keeps selling past zero is a false statement, and Canada prices it as one.
后来呢
TDG and its affiliates — TDG Furniture, DFA Operations, DF Swan and Furniture Investment Group — are bound by the consent agreement, with compliance programs in place. The case is the Bureau's citation for countdown-timer dark patterns.
资料来源
- Competition Bureau Canada — The Dufresne Group to pay $3.25 million penalty to settle Competition Bureau concerns over marketing claims
- Harris & Co. — Dufresne Group Pays $3.25M CAD for Dark Patterns and Unsupported Pricing
发现哪里写错了?告诉我们。
类似的案例
这家公司栽倒的地方,别处有人漂亮地解开过。 第二意见 →

Comments · 0
登录 后就能评论。