mistake.club 是 2nd Opinion 旗下档案库 ↗
mistake.club
返回档案库

案例库 · 广告与公关 · 市场决策 · 2021

这条还没译成中文,下面是英文原文。

Canada Goose called its down 'the warmest' on Tmall — most of it was duck, not goose

Canada Goose's China store called its filling 'the warmest' Canadian down. Most jackets it sold used duck down instead, and regulators fined it 450,000 yuan.

Canada Goose · 2021-09

怎么回事

Canada Goose's official Tmall flagship store described its jackets as 'hailed as the best cross-country jacket' and said its down filling was Hutterite down — 'excellent and the warmest Canadian down' — copy built to justify prices well above domestic rivals on the strength of the down itself.

Shanghai's Huangpu district market regulator investigated and found the claim did not match what the store actually sold: of 190 down garment styles on offer, about 16.8% used goose down and roughly 83.2% used duck down, which has lower fill power. Calling the down 'excellent and the warmest' as a blanket claim, when most of the range was the lower-fill material, did not match the products behind it.

Regulators ruled the claims false advertising under China's Advertisement Law, fined the operating company 450,000 yuan, and ordered it to stop running the ads and to eliminate the false impression within the same scope it had been advertised.

为什么会这样

  • The claim generalised from the premium end of the range to the whole line, so a superlative defensible for one style became false once read as covering all 190.
  • 'The warmest' is exactly the absolute, unqualified claim advertising law targets, since it invites a regulator to test it against the full catalogue, not the flagship item.
  • Down type is a checkable physical fact rather than opinion, so the gap between the copy and what was actually sold was easy for a regulator to establish.
代价450,000 yuan fine; ordered to stop the ads代价高昂

教训

Canada Goose called its down 'the warmest' on Tmall; most of what it sold was lower-fill duck down. Shanghai fined it 450,000 yuan. A superlative has to be true of the range, not the flagship item.

后来呢

Shanghai's Huangpu district regulator fined the store operator 450,000 yuan for false advertising and ordered the ads pulled and the false impression corrected within the scope it had reached.

资料来源

发现哪里写错了?告诉我们。

Comments · 0

    登录 后就能评论。

    类似的案例

    这家公司栽倒的地方,别处有人漂亮地解开过。 第二意见 →