Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Marketing & Brand · Strategic decision · 2019–2026

Xponential Fitness misled franchisees on costs and executive lawsuits — $17M

Xponential Fitness claimed franchisees could open in six months when it took over a year, and hid a CEO sued for fraud from disclosure forms.

Xponential Fitness Inc. · 2026-03-18

What happened

Xponential Fitness Inc., based in Irvine, California, built a fitness studio empire through franchising brands including Club Pilates, Pure Barre, YogaSix, StretchLab, and BFT. It sold franchise licences to thousands of prospective owners across the United States, charging an average initial fee of $45,000 per studio with a 10-year franchise agreement.

What the company's Franchise Disclosure Documents (FDDs) did not tell prospective franchisees was that former CEO Anthony Geisler had been repeatedly sued for fraud, that the former President of Franchise Development had an undisclosed bankruptcy, and that franchisees typically took more than a year — not the promised six months — to open their studios after signing. The FDDs also misreported or omitted the names and contact information of franchisees whose studios had closed.

The FTC found that Xponential failed to provide timely, complete, and accurate FDDs at least 14 days before signing as required by the FTC's Franchise Rule. Franchisees paid substantial fees and entered long-term commitments without knowing that the opening timelines were systematically misrepresented, that key executives carried undisclosed litigation histories, and that many previous franchisees had struggled or failed.

On March 18, 2026, the FTC announced a $17 million settlement with Xponential — the largest amount ever returned to consumers in a franchise rule enforcement action. The company is permanently prohibited from misrepresenting material facts about its franchise offerings and must comply with all Franchise Rule requirements, including providing complete and accurate FDDs. The order also imposes ongoing compliance reporting and FTC monitoring for ten years.

Why it happened

  • Franchise disclosure documents exist to give buyers the facts to evaluate risk — Xponential's FDDs omitted the CEO's fraud lawsuits and the true timeline to revenue
  • The same deceptive practices ran across Club Pilates, Pure Barre, YogaSix, StretchLab, and BFT simultaneously, amplifying the harm across hundreds of franchisees
  • A $45,000 fee with a 10-year lock-in is a life-changing investment — the FTC called the deception a denial of the ability to evaluate costs and risks
  • The $17 million settlement — the largest franchise rule penalty in FTC history — signals the agency viewed the violations as systemic, not a paperwork oversight
What it cost$17M settlement; permanent franchise misrepresentation bancostly

The lesson

A franchisor that hides executive lawsuits and true opening timelines from its disclosure documents is not making a paperwork error — it is selling a franchise on a lie.

Aftermath

Xponential Fitness paid $17 million for consumer redress. The stipulated order permanently prohibits the company from misrepresenting any material fact about its franchise offerings, including opening timelines, executive backgrounds, litigation history, and franchisee turnover. The company must comply with all Franchise Rule requirements, provide accurate and timely FDDs, and submit to FTC compliance monitoring and annual reporting for ten years. The order was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →