Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Finance & Accounting · Financial decision · 2017

Wanda built 13 theme-park cities — then sold them all in one afternoon

On 19 July 2017 Wanda sold 91% of its 13 Wanda City tourism projects to Sunac and 77 hotels to R&F for ¥63.75B — a fire sale to save the group.

Wanda Group · 万达集团 · Sunac · R&F · 2017-07

What happened

For years Wanda's signature ambition was the Wanda City: giant tourism complexes pairing theme parks with malls, hotels and shows, built across China. Then the credit tightened. Facing a liquidity crunch and roughly ¥200 billion of loans and bonds, Wanda needed cash fast.

On 19 July 2017 Wang Jianlin signed a three-way deal: Sunac bought 91 percent of the 13 Wanda City projects for ¥43.844 billion — the projects also took on about ¥45.4 billion of existing loans — and R&F bought all 77 Wanda hotels for ¥19.906 billion. Total: ¥63.75 billion of assets, gone in one signing.

Wang called it a win for all three sides: Wanda cut its debt and moved toward an asset-light model, Sunac and R&F gained scale. It was the moment China's build-everything property era visibly turned.

Why it happened

  • Roughly ¥200B of loans and bonds against tightening credit left no choice but to sell assets at speed.
  • The heavy-asset model — parks, hotels, malls built simultaneously — burned cash faster than it returned it.
  • The structure kept shifting under pressure: the hotel package moved from Sunac to R&F just days before signing.
What it cost13 park cities + 77 hotels, gonecostly

The lesson

Wanda traded its entire tourism empire — 13 park cities and 77 hotels — for ¥63.75B in one afternoon, because leverage that builds fast also matures fast.

Aftermath

Sunac and R&F took over the parks and hotels; Wanda repositioned as an asset-light operator managing properties it no longer owned.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →