The encyclopedia · R&D & Science · Strategic decision · 1999–2007
Vioxx caused up to 140,000 heart attacks — Merck paid $4.85B to settle
Merck's blockbuster painkiller Vioxx doubled heart attack risk. Estimated 88,000–140,000 cases, $2.5B in annual sales lost, and $4.85B in settlements.
Merck & Co. · 2004-09
What happened
Vioxx (rofecoxib) was a COX-2 inhibitor approved by the FDA in May 1999 for arthritis and acute pain. It became one of the most prescribed drugs in the world, with annual sales of $2.5 billion at its peak. Merck marketed it as a safer alternative to older NSAIDs because it caused fewer gastrointestinal side effects. But the VIGOR study, published in 2000, found a 4.25-fold increase in heart attacks compared to naproxen — a finding Merck dismissed as a statistical artifact.
Merck withheld the cardiovascular risk data from doctors and patients for over four years. The APPROVe study, an Alzheimer's prevention trial, was terminated early in 2004 when it confirmed a 1.92-fold increase in thrombotic events after 18 months of use. On 30 September 2004, Merck voluntarily withdrew Vioxx worldwide. An FDA analyst later estimated that Vioxx may have caused 88,000 to 140,000 serious cardiovascular events in the US alone, 30–40% of them fatal.
Merck faced over 27,000 lawsuits. In November 2007, the company agreed to a $4.85 billion settlement covering most claims. In 2011, Merck paid an additional $950 million to settle civil claims with US authorities and pleaded guilty to a federal misdemeanor, incurring a $321.6 million fine. The Vioxx scandal permanently changed how COX-2 inhibitors and NSAIDs are labelled and prescribed, and it remains one of the largest drug safety scandals in history.
Why it happened
- Merck knew about the cardiovascular risk from the VIGOR study in 2000 but dismissed it publicly and continued aggressive marketing — the company withheld a known safety signal for over four years.
- The drug was a blockbuster with $2.5B in annual sales, and Merck had no replacement ready — the financial incentive to keep Vioxx on the market was strong enough to override safety concerns.
- Merck's internal documents showed executives discussing how to 'manage' the cardiovascular data rather than report it to regulators — the scandal was not a mistake but a deliberate choice.
The lesson
A drug that doubles the risk of heart attacks is not a blockbuster with a data problem — it is a killing machine, and a $4.85 billion settlement is the price of four years of inaction.
Sources
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Physicist faked room-temp superconductivity — 5 retractions, thesis 21% plagiarized
Stanford president resigned over manipulated images — 5 papers retracted or corrected
Zantac was the world's bestselling heartburn drug — then it turned out to cause cancer
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.