Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Software & IT · Technical decision · 2018

Uber's self-driving car killed a pedestrian — she was classified as 'other'

In 2018, Uber's autonomous vehicle killed a pedestrian in Arizona. The software classified her as a false positive. The safety driver was on a phone.

Uber · 2018-03-18

What happened

On March 18, 2018, an Uber autonomous test vehicle struck and killed Elaine Herzberg, a 49-year-old pedestrian, in Tempe, Arizona. It was the first fatality involving a self-driving car in autonomous mode.

The investigation found that the vehicle's software detected Herzberg 5.6 seconds before impact but classified her as a 'false positive' — an object to be ignored. The software's classification system cycled through 'unknown,' 'vehicle' and 'bicycle' labels but never settled on a category that would trigger braking. The safety driver, who was supposed to monitor the road, was watching a television show on her phone.

Uber suspended its self-driving program and settled with Herzberg's family. The NTSB found that Uber had disabled the Volvo's built-in emergency braking system to avoid 'false positives' and had reduced the safety driver staffing from two to one. The case illustrated how the pressure to demonstrate progress in autonomous driving can lead to safety compromises, and how a system that classifies a human as a 'false positive' has a fundamental design problem.

Why it happened

  • The software detected Herzberg but classified her as a 'false positive' and did not brake.
  • The safety driver was watching a phone and did not intervene.
  • Uber had disabled the Volvo's built-in emergency braking to avoid false positives.
  • Safety driver staffing had been reduced from two to one.
What it costa pedestrian killed; the programme shut downcatastrophic

The lesson

A system that classifies a human as a 'false positive' is not a safety system. Uber disabled emergency braking to reduce false alarms. In autonomous driving, a missed detection is a death.

Aftermath

Uber suspended and later scaled back its self-driving program. The safety driver was charged with negligent homicide. The NTSB's report prompted reforms in autonomous vehicle testing protocols. The case remains the defining event in the ethics of autonomous driving.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →