Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2025

'Hang it on your neck to remove viruses' — Toa Sangyo's pendant had no proof

Toa Sangyo sold pendants that claimed to 'remove viruses in the space' around the wearer. Its evidence didn't hold up. CAA surcharge: ¥16.51M.

Toa Sangyo · 2025-01-30

What happened

At the start of the pandemic, Toa Sangyo sold 'Virus Shut Out' — a pendant worn around the neck — on its own website and its Rakuten Ichiba page. Between 26 February and 10 March 2020 the advertising promised 'Emergency virus countermeasure!!', 'Protects you from epidemic viruses!', and claimed that chlorine-dioxide-based ingredients 'remove viruses and bacteria floating around you', beside visuals of viruses drifting around the wearer. The headline: just hang it on your neck to remove the viruses in the space.

The Consumer Affairs Agency demanded substantiation, and the documents Toa Sangyo submitted were not accepted as reasonable grounds for the claims. A small disclaimer — 'effects vary depending on the usage environment' — did not cancel the message out. The displays were ruled misleading representations of superiority.

On 30 January 2025 the CAA ordered Toa Sangyo to pay a surcharge of 16,510,000 yen — 3% of the product's sales during the violation period, payable by 1 September 2025. The order came five years after the ads ran, but the surcharge regime reaches back: sales made on the strength of an unsubstantiated claim stay billable long after the fear that drove them has passed.

Why it happened

  • The claim was absolute — wear it and the viruses around you are removed — and the substantiation Toa Sangyo submitted was not accepted as reasonable grounds.
  • A 'results vary by environment' disclaimer does not cancel a headline claim; the CAA did not count it.
  • The surcharge reached five years back: sales from February–March 2020 became a ¥16.51M bill in January 2025.
What it cost¥16.51M surchargecostly

The lesson

Health claims need evidence that survives scrutiny: Toa Sangyo sold 'virus-removing' pendants without acceptable substantiation and paid ¥16.51M in surcharges five years on.

Aftermath

The CAA's surcharge order of 30 January 2025 required Toa Sangyo, of Chiyoda-ku Tokyo, to pay 16,510,000 yen by 1 September 2025, calculated on sales of the Virus Shut Out pendant between 26 February and 10 March 2020. The company's submitted substantiation was rejected as lacking reasonable grounds.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →