The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2001–2017
Condé Nast banned Terry Richardson — 15 years of allegations, one leaked email
After 15 years of allegations, Condé Nast cut Terry Richardson in October 2017 — Valentino, Bulgari and Harper's Bazaar followed within days.
Condé Nast · Valentino · Bulgari · Terry Richardson (photographer) · 2017-10-24
What happened
For fifteen years the allegations had circulated without consequences. Models had been accusing Richardson of coercive behaviour on shoots since 2001, a 2013 Change.org petition asking brands to sever ties passed 30,000 signatures, and in 2014 H&M declared it would not use him in the future — and the commissions kept coming.
In October 2017, in the wake of the Harvey Weinstein scandal, The Telegraph obtained a leaked internal email from Condé Nast International's James Woolhouse: "Condé Nast would like to no longer work with the photographer Terry Richardson. Any shoots that have been commission[ed] or any shoots that have been completed but not yet published, should be killed and substituted with other material." The US office followed: "Condé Nast has nothing planned with him going forward. Harassment of any kind is unacceptable and should not be tolerated."
Within days the rest of the industry answered. Valentino said "there are no plans for a future campaign and of course [we] take these allegations seriously." Bulgari called its previous collaborations "one-off initiatives" with "no plans to work with him again." Harper's Bazaar UK said "there are no plans to work with him in the future."
Richardson's spokeswoman said he was "disappointed" — "He is an artist who has been known for his sexually explicit work... all of the subjects of his work participated consensually." The ban held: the magazines and houses that had commissioned him for a decade never came back.
Why it happened
- The trigger was not a new allegation — it was context. Fifteen years of reports had not moved Condé Nast; the Weinstein scandal changed what keeping silent cost.
- The decision went out as an internal email ordering already-commissioned work killed — one decision for the whole company, made in a moment, not title by title.
- The leak did the work of a public statement: once the email was in The Telegraph, the US office and the fashion houses had to answer, and their answers all ended the same way.
- The 2014 H&M refusal showed one brand could say no — but it changed nothing until the whole system moved together.
The lesson
An industry that tolerated allegations for 15 years moved in a single day once the cost of silence changed — the email was leaked, but the decision was made before anyone saw it.
Aftermath
The ban held. No major title or fashion house commissioned Richardson again, and his decade of covers and campaigns ended with the leaked email. He denied the allegations throughout — "I collaborated with consenting adult women who were fully aware of the nature of the work" — and his spokeswoman repeated the denial when the ban became public. The episode became a marker of the 2017 reckoning: a photographer who had outlasted petitions and public accusations fell the moment an internal email leaked.
Sources
- The Guardian — Fashion brands drop Terry Richardson over allegations of abuse on shoots, 24 Oct 2017 (Condé Nast email verbatim; Valentino, Bulgari, Harper's Bazaar UK statements; spokeswoman response)
- The Hollywood Reporter — Terry Richardson Banned From Working With Condé Nast Publications, 24 Oct 2017 (Telegraph origin; Condé Nast US statement verbatim; petition history)
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Condé Nast stopped commissioning Bruce Weber and Mario Testino in one day
A Cupshe staffer emailed 'we would not collab with black people' — hired four days earlier
A body found in d4vd's Tesla emptied Crocs and Hollister's campaign within days
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →
Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.