The encyclopedia · Marketing & Brand · Marketing decision · 2024
Tala's founder Grace Beverley hid her own brand's ads — the ASA banned them
In May 2024 the ASA banned six Tala posts on founder Grace Beverley's own account — her promotion of her own coat was not identifiable as advertising.
Tala (We Are Tala Ltd) · 2024-05-22
What happened
In May 2024 the UK's Advertising Standards Authority banned six social posts by Grace Beverley — two Instagram reels and four TikToks from October 2023 — promoting a coat from Tala, the activewear brand she founded in 2019. The ASA ruled the posts breached CAP Code rules on recognition of marketing communications: they were not obviously identifiable as advertising, and they could not appear again in their current form.
The case turned on whether Beverley's identity counted as disclosure. She was Tala's founder and director — paid as an employee — and her representatives argued she was so synonymous with the brand that her audience would know the posts were marketing. The ASA disagreed: users who did not follow Beverley closely would likely be unaware of her connection to Tala, and the 'aggressive marketing' language in her bio and first-person posts did not make the commercial nature clear. More than 50 complainants had challenged the posts.
Beverley, 27, had built one of Britain's biggest creator businesses — a million Instagram followers, 150,000 on TikTok, a Forbes 30 Under 30 listing in 2020 — and Tala was the centerpiece. Her response was cooperative: she said she was 'respectful of the ASA's work' and wanted 'conversation, clarity and transparency'; Tala said it 'has always endeavoured to follow ASA guidance.' The ruling set a precedent that a founder's fame is not disclosure — the paid relationship must be stated.
Why it happened
- The brand treated the founder's personal account as free media — her fame was the channel, so the promotion looked like content instead of an ad and skipped the disclosure rules.
- The argument that everyone knows she owns the brand assumed the audience's knowledge instead of proving it — the ASA required the commercial relationship to be visible in the post itself.
- The scale of the following multiplied the breach: a million followers saw ads that carried no label, which is exactly what the disclosure rules exist to prevent.
The lesson
An audience's familiarity with a founder is not a disclosure label — when the promoter owns the brand, the ad still has to say it is an ad.
Aftermath
The ruling bound Tala's future posts to clear '#ad' labelling and became a reference point for UK influencer-marketing compliance — the ASA had been tightening disclosure enforcement, and the case showed that even a founder's own account is commercial space when it sells the company's products.
Sources
- ASA Ruling on We Are Tala Ltd (May 2024) — ASA
- Influencer Grace Beverley's Tala posts banned by ad watchdog — BBC News (May 2024)
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Morphe bet the brand on beauty influencers — then the partnerships went sour
Burberry burned £28.6M of unsold stock to protect the brand — the brand took the damage
Jaded London's holiday email glamorised smoking — the ASA banned it
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.