The encyclopedia · Finance & Accounting · Financial decision · 2019–2023
Stark Corporation faked THB 8B in sales, then crashed from $1.7B to $11M
A cable maker fabricated billions in revenue. Shares plunged 99% and 3,417 creditors were left with THB 131B in claims.
Stark Corporation
What happened
Stark Corporation was originally Siam Inter Multimedia (SMM), a comics publisher founded in 1990. In 2019, Vonnarat Tangkaravakoon — eldest son of the family behind Thailand's largest paint producer TOA — acquired majority control, renamed the company Stark, and pivoted it to electrical wire and cable manufacturing by purchasing Phelps Dodge International (Thailand). The company expanded rapidly through more acquisitions and briefly attempted a €560 million deal to buy German cable maker Leoni, which fell through.
A special audit by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) later uncovered systematic accounting fraud. Stark had booked THB 8 billion in fake sales transactions in 2022 and THB 3.59 billion in 2021. The 2021 financial statements, originally reported as a THB 2.79 billion profit by Deloitte, were restated as a THB 5.97 billion loss. For 2022, Stark posted a net loss of THB 6.61 billion. The company had negative shareholders' equity of THB 2.9 billion in one year and THB 4.4 billion the next.
When Stark failed to submit its 2022 financial statements on time in February 2023, the Stock Exchange of Thailand suspended trading. Shares resumed in June and plunged 92% in one day, eventually wiping out 99% of the value. Market capitalisation collapsed from over US$1.7 billion to roughly US$11 million. The SET moved to delist Stark after it recorded negative shareholders' equity for two consecutive years.
Bondholders demanded immediate payment of over THB 6.9 billion. The Department of Special Investigation seized assets worth over THB 100 million. The Central Bankruptcy Court is set to declare Vonnarat Tangkaravakoon bankrupt, with 3,417 creditors holding combined claims of THB 131.4 billion. The Securities and Exchange Commission filed civil and criminal charges against former executives. The total estimated loss from the fraud, including damage to shareholders, bondholders and creditors, is approximately THB 100 billion.
Why it happened
- Stark acquired a cable business it did not know how to run, then fabricated revenue to mask the deteriorating operations.
- A single controlling shareholder with no personal wealth buffer drove the company from a THB 2.79B profit claim to a THB 5.97B restated loss — a swing of THB 8.76B in the same year's books.
- The bond market funded the acquisition spree with no covenants that would have flagged the phantom revenue before the accounting restatement.
- The backdoor listing structure (SMM acquisition + rename) gave Stark public-company status without the governance track record that a direct IPO would have required.
The lesson
An acquisition strategy funded entirely by debt and untested for a backdoor-listed company can collapse when the financial statements turn out to be fiction.
Sources
- The Stark reality of a company in decline — Bangkok Post
- After 99% stock rout, debt-stricken Thai firm Stark seeks way to avoid delisting — Bangkok Post
- Court to declare former Stark executive bankrupt — Bangkok Post
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
An auditor flagged Serba Dinamik's books — the company sued, then collapsed
Jiwasraya execs stole Rp 16.8T from a state insurer over a decade — all three got life
Truong My Lan looted $44B from SCB in Vietnam's largest financial fraud
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.