The encyclopedia · Product & Design · Product decision · 2017
Snapchat's Spectacles were camera glasses nobody wanted to wear in public
Snap's $130 camera sunglasses recorded 10-second clips. They sold ~220K units, left $40M in unsold inventory, and became a drawer gadget.
Snap Inc. · 2017
What happened
Snapchat's parent company Snap Inc. launched Spectacles in November 2016: $130 sunglasses with a built-in camera that recorded 10-second video clips from the wearer's perspective. The product was marketed as a fun, casual way to capture moments hands-free.
But Spectacles suffered from the same social acceptance problem that would later plague Google Glass. Wearing camera glasses in public made people uncomfortable — both the wearer and the people being recorded. The 10-second limit was restrictive, the video quality was mediocre, and the novelty wore off quickly.
Snap sold approximately 220,000 units and was left with roughly $40 million in unsold inventory. The company wrote off the loss and continued to iterate on Spectacles, but the product never achieved mainstream adoption. The case illustrated how a product can be fun in a demo and useless in daily life, and how social discomfort is a product defect that no amount of marketing can fix.
Why it happened
- Wearing camera glasses in public made people uncomfortable — a social acceptance problem no marketing could fix.
- The 10-second recording limit was restrictive, and video quality was mediocre.
- The novelty wore off quickly, and the glasses became a drawer gadget.
- Snap was left with ~$40M in unsold inventory.
The lesson
Social discomfort is a product defect. Spectacles were fun in a demo and awkward in public. If the product makes the user self-conscious, it has failed.
Aftermath
Snap continued to iterate on Spectacles, releasing new versions with AR features. The product remains a niche device. The case is cited alongside Google Glass as an example of how wearable cameras face a social acceptance barrier that technology alone cannot overcome.
Sources
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Google Glass was a $1,500 glimpse of the future — that the public rejected
Amazon built a $300M spy franchise, then cut both its local hit spinoffs
Quibi spent $1.75B launching a service nobody wanted because it ignored mobile habits
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.