Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2025

Shin-Nihon Enex's 'No.1' solar claims rested on a survey of impressions

Six 'No.1' banners on its website, all based on surveys that only asked people's impressions. CAA surcharge: ¥99.89M on ¥3.33B of solar-system sales.

Shin-Nihon Enex · 2025-06-05

What happened

Shin-Nihon Enex sells household solar-power systems and storage batteries from Fukuoka. On its website it displayed a string of No.1 banners: 'No.1 JMR solar/storage-battery sales with solid after-service', 'No.1 2022 JMR solar/storage-battery sales you can install with peace of mind' and 'No.1 2022 JMR storage-battery sales you would want to recommend to a friend' — plus a 2020 set that included 'Customer Satisfaction No.1'. Each claimed first place in its category on the strength of surveys by Japan Marketing Research (JMR).

The catch was the surveys themselves. JMR had never checked whether respondents actually used Shin-Nihon Enex's or its competitors' products — they only asked about impressions. Nor did the website quote the survey results accurately. The Consumer Affairs Agency judged the displays misleading: consumers would read 'No.1' as a ranking among real users. On 27 February 2024 the agency had already issued a measure order against the same displays, together with another solar installer, Anshinrai Home.

On 5 June 2025 the CAA ordered Shin-Nihon Enex to pay a surcharge of 99,890,000 yen — 3% of the 3,329,796,494 yen in sales of solar systems and batteries recorded between 10 April and 29 November 2023, though the banners ran only from 10 April to 29 May — payable by 6 January 2026. A survey of impressions had accompanied ¥3.3 billion of sales; the surcharge regime turned the difference into a bill.

Why it happened

  • The 'No.1' rankings rested on surveys that only asked impressions — respondents were never checked for actual use of Shin-Nihon Enex's or rivals' products.
  • The website did not quote the survey results accurately; 'No.1' read as a ranking among real users.
  • A measure order came in February 2024; fifteen months later the same displays became a ¥99.89M surcharge bill.
What it cost¥99.89M surchargecostly

The lesson

A 'No.1' claim needs a real survey: Shin-Nihon Enex's six rankings rested on impression polls of people who hadn't used the products, and Japan charged ¥99.89M on ¥3.3B of sales.

Aftermath

The surcharge order of 5 June 2025 required Shin-Nihon Enex to pay 99,890,000 yen by 6 January 2026, on 3,329,796,494 yen of sales recorded between 10 April and 29 November 2023. The displays had already drawn a measure order on 27 February 2024.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →