Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Finance & Accounting · Strategic decision · 2015–2023

Sendy raised $26.5M to fix African logistics — it died waiting for the next round

Toyota Tsusho and Mitsui's venture arm were in. The $100M round never came, one investor walked, and 200 staff learned the news in an asset sale.

Sendy

What happened

Sendy was co-founded in Nairobi in 2015 by Meshack Alloys, Evanson Biwott, Don Okoth and Malaika Judd, to digitise Africa's fragmented logistics: matching retailers buying fast-moving consumer goods directly from manufacturers with the trucks and riders to move them. Over eight years it raised $26.5 million from investors including Toyota Tsusho, Keppel Capital and MOL PLUS, the venture arm of Japan's Mitsui O.S.K. Lines.

The business ran on the same thin margins as every B2B e-logistics player — operational costs high, customer pricing marginal — and by 2023 it had already cut: layoffs, a product line shut, Nigeria exited. The plan was a $100 million raise to reach scale. What arrived was a fraction of that from MOL PLUS, and then a key investor in the later round backed out entirely.

The money ran out around June 2023; by 8 August the shutdown was public and the asset sale had begun — tech and fulfilment operations shopped to regional players including Trella, Sabi and Wasoko, with more than 200 employees affected. Sendy's failure is the classic shape of African startup economics: real demand, real infrastructure value, and a capital requirement the available rounds could not meet at the scale the unit economics demanded.

Why it happened

  • B2B logistics margins are thin by physics — vehicles, fuel, riders — and a startup cannot out-lose the informal operators it competes with unless capital buys the scale first.
  • A $100M target with a fraction committed is not a round, it is a hope; when the anchor investor walks, the fraction becomes the whole and the whole is not enough.
  • Cost-cutting — layoffs, exits, product closures — extends a runway measured against a burn the cuts themselves admit is structural, not temporary.
What it cost$26.5M raised, assets sold offcatastrophic

The lesson

If the model needs scale and rounds arrive smaller than it needs, every raise is a delay, not a fix — build to the capital you can access; economics proven right at the wrong size still kill you.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →