Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Legal & Compliance · Legal decision · 2003–2012

SCO bet the company on a $1B lawsuit — then learned it never owned the Unix copyright

SCO sued IBM for $1B over Unix code in Linux — spent $31M on legal fees, lost when the court ruled Novell owned the copyright, and filed for bankruptcy.

SCO Group (formerly Caldera International) · 2003-03-06

What happened

The SCO Group was formed in 2002 when Caldera International renamed itself after acquiring the Unix operating system assets of the Santa Cruz Operation. SCO owned UnixWare and OpenServer, two commercial Unix distributions, and employed about 400 people. In fiscal 2003, the company reported $79 million in revenue and $3.4 million in profit — its best year.

On March 6, 2003, SCO sued IBM for at least $1 billion, claiming IBM had misappropriated SCO's trade secrets by contributing portions of its Unix-based AIX operating system into the Linux kernel. The lawsuit was the opening move in an aggressive legal campaign to monetize SCO's Unix intellectual property. SCO hired David Boies, the lawyer who had argued the US v. Microsoft case, and created the SCOsource division to sell Unix license rights to Linux users. For a time, the strategy appeared to work — SCO's stock rose from under $1.50 to over $22.

The strategy collapsed on August 10, 2007, when Judge Dale Kimball ruled in SCO v. Novell that Novell — not SCO — had always owned the Unix copyrights. SCO owed Novell 95% of the revenue it had collected from licensing Unix. Five weeks later, SCO filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. The company had spent over $31 million on legal fees. SCO's Unix and mobility assets were sold off in 2011; the company converted to Chapter 7 liquidation in 2012. The remnant of the IBM lawsuit dragged on until 2021, when it was settled for a tiny fraction of the original claim.

Why it happened

  • SCO bet the company on a lawsuit claiming IBM stole Unix code for Linux — but never verified that it actually owned the copyrights it was asserting, as the 2007 Novell ruling exposed.
  • SCO spent over $31 million in legal fees on a single bet-the-company strategy — when the core claim collapsed, there was no business left to fall back on.
  • CEO Darl McBride pursued an aggressive IP monetization campaign, suing IBM and threatening Linux users with license fees — a strategy that required winning every battle and lost the decisive one.
  • SCO (then Caldera) bought Unix assets from Novell via the Santa Cruz Operation — but the copyrights were never transferred, a detail nobody checked before launching a billion-dollar lawsuit.
What it cost$31M legal fees; Chapter 11; company liquidatedcostly

The lesson

SCO bet the company on a lawsuit without checking whether it owned the one asset the lawsuit depended on. That is not litigation strategy — it is gambling with the truth.

Aftermath

Judge Kimball's 2007 ruling that Novell owned the Unix copyrights destroyed SCO's case. The company filed Chapter 11 in Sept 2007. SCO's assets were sold in 2011: its Unix business to UnXis, its mobility division to Xinuos. Renamed The TSG Group, it converted to Chapter 7 liquidation in 2012. The SCO v. IBM case limped on until 2021, when a settlement was reached for a fraction of the original claim. CEO Darl McBride was convicted of securities fraud in 2022 for misleading investors. The case remains a textbook example of the risks of bet-the-company litigation.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →