Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Strategy & Leadership · Strategic decision · 1972

Five IBM engineers left to build the software IBM refused to build — and outgrew IBM

In 1972, five former IBM engineers pooled their savings to build enterprise software. IBM had the idea first and said no. SAP is now worth more than IBM.

SAP SE · IBM

HearsayWidely repeated, and we cannot show you a document for it. Read it for the lesson, not as fact.

What it means today

Every large company has a SAP in its history: the project killed because it threatened existing revenue, and the team that left to build it anyway. The question is whether the company can tolerate cannibalising its own cash cow.

What happened

In the early 1970s, a team of IBM engineers in Mannheim developed a prototype for real-time enterprise software — a system that could process business transactions (accounting, payroll, inventory) as they happened, rather than in overnight batch runs. IBM's management decided the product was not a priority. The mainframe business was profitable; the new software was a distraction.

In 1972, five of the engineers — Dietmar Hopp, Hasso Plattner, Claus Wellenreuther, Klaus Tschira, and Hans-Werner Hector — left IBM and founded SAP (Systemanalyse und Programmentwicklung) in a small office in Mannheim. They pooled their savings. Their first client was a chemical company that needed real-time accounting. The software they built became SAP R/2, then R/3, then the enterprise resource planning (ERP) standard that runs most of the world's large companies.

The story is told in interviews and in Hasso Plattner's occasional public remarks: the decision to leave IBM was not a rebellion but a calculation. IBM had the idea, the engineers, and the customers. What IBM did not have was the willingness to cannibalise its own batch-processing revenue. The five founders had nothing to cannibalise, so they built the thing IBM would not.

Why it happened

  • IBM's batch-processing business was profitable. Real-time software would have made it obsolete. The decision to say no was rational for the existing business — and fatal for the next one
  • The five founders had domain expertise and customer relationships from IBM. What they lacked was capital, brand, and distribution — all of which they built from the revenue of the first product
  • The German industrial base — chemical, automotive, engineering — was the perfect first market: large companies with complex processes and no existing software. SAP grew with its customers
What it costIBM's loss; SAP's gain; €300B+ market createdcostly

The lesson

The most dangerous competitor is the one you trained. IBM's engineers built SAP with IBM's knowledge and customer list. IBM did not give them permission — permission was the one thing not needed.

Aftermath

SAP is now the world's largest enterprise software company, with a market capitalisation exceeding IBM's. All five founders became billionaires. Hasso Plattner remains SAP's chairman. IBM's enterprise software business, built decades later, has never matched SAP's market share in ERP.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →