Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Finance & Accounting · Financial decision · 2019–2020

SABIC's profit collapsed 74% and it posted a first loss in a decade — the upcycle's bill

SABIC, one of the world's biggest petrochemical makers, saw 2019 profit fall 74% and swing to a first quarterly loss in ten years. Then the writedowns came.

SABIC · 2020

What happened

SABIC — Saudi Basic Industries Corporation, one of the world's largest petrochemical makers and majority-owned by Saudi Aramco — had ridden the petrochemical boom to a net profit of SAR 21.5 billion in 2018. In 2019 that profit fell 74 percent to SAR 5.6 billion, and revenue fell 17 percent to SAR 139.7 billion.

The fall turned into a loss. In the fourth quarter of 2019 SABIC posted a net loss of SAR 0.72 billion ($192 million) — its first quarterly loss in a decade, since early 2009. The company blamed a further decline in petrochemical prices, driven by oversupply in its key products and slowing global growth.

Then came the writedowns. The fourth quarter carried SAR 1.3 billion of non-recurring charges, including an impairment of SABIC's share of its affiliate Ibn Rushd, tied to a restructuring that would close certain assets in 2020. The year's results also absorbed a roughly SAR 1.5 billion loss on its stake in the Swiss specialty-chemicals group Clariant, and in 2020 SABIC impaired about SAR 1.18 billion of European petrochemical assets.

The impairments were the point. SABIC had valued its plants and its stakes while petrochemicals were booming; when oversupply pushed prices down, those assets no longer earned what they had cost, and the company wrote them down and began closing them. The first loss in a decade was less a single bad quarter than the bill for capacity and acquisitions made at the top of the cycle.

Why it happened

  • SABIC's profits tracked petrochemical prices; when industry capacity oversupplied the market and prices fell, the earnings that had looked permanent in 2018 collapsed
  • The impairments — Ibn Rushd, Clariant, European assets — were admissions that plants and stakes valued during the boom would not earn their book value once prices fell
  • A first quarterly loss in ten years signaled that the downturn had moved from squeezing margins to destroying the value of the assets themselves
  • Restructuring and asset closures followed the writedowns; the company was shrinking the capacity it had carried at the top of the cycle
What it costprofit down 74%; first loss in a decadecostly

The lesson

A writedown admits an asset won't earn what it cost. SABIC impaired plants and stakes it had valued while petrochemicals boomed; when oversupply came, those assets were the first written off.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →