The encyclopedia · R&D & Science · Operational decision · 1997–2000
Rezulin generated $2.1B in sales — the FDA officer who said no was removed, 63+ died
Rezulin was approved in 1997 despite liver toxicity. The FDA officer who said no was removed. 63+ died. Pfizer paid $750M for 35,000 claims.
Warner-Lambert (Parke-Davis) · Pfizer · Daiichi Sankyo · 2000-03-21
What happened
Rezulin (troglitazone) was a diabetes drug that promised a new way to treat type 2 diabetes by reducing insulin resistance. Approved by the FDA on 29 January 1997, it became a blockbuster — generating over $2.1 billion in sales for Warner-Lambert within three years. But the approval process was deeply compromised. The FDA's own medical officer, Dr. John Gueriguian, had recommended against approval because of liver toxicity signals in the trial data. After Warner-Lambert complained about him, he was removed from the review.
The first death occurred in an NIH study in May 1998 — patient Audrey LaRue Jones died of acute liver failure despite being closely monitored. The FDA's own epidemiologist, David Graham, later warned that Rezulin caused liver failure at 1,200 times the background rate and estimated that over 430 liver failures were linked to the drug. Despite this, the FDA did not withdraw Rezulin until March 2000 — nearly two years after the first confirmed death.
By the time Rezulin was pulled, it had been linked to at least 63 deaths from liver failure in the US alone, with many more injuries. The UK had already withdrawn it in December 1997. In 2000, Pfizer acquired Warner-Lambert and inherited the liability. In 2009, Pfizer paid approximately $750 million to settle about 35,000 claims. The company had set aside $955 million for Rezulin cases in 2004. The case is taught as a failure of both drug development and regulatory oversight.
Why it happened
- The FDA medical officer who recommended against Rezulin's approval was removed after the developer complained — the regulatory gate was opened by silencing the person guarding it
- Warner-Lambert marketed the drug for three years despite knowing about liver toxicity — the first death occurred in a monitored study in 1998, but Rezulin was not withdrawn until 2000
- The FDA's own epidemiologist estimated over 430 liver failures linked to Rezulin, yet the agency waited two years after the first death to withdraw it — the delay cost lives
The lesson
Company complains about medical officer → officer removed. The drug is no safer, just someone else's problem. Rezulin was a regulatory failure before it was even sold.
Aftermath
Rezulin was withdrawn globally by March 2000. Warner-Lambert was acquired by Pfizer in 2000, and Pfizer spent over a decade settling the resulting lawsuits — approximately $750 million for 35,000 claims. The case is cited alongside Vioxx as an example of how close relationships between drug companies and regulators can lead to unsafe products remaining on the market. The FDA's handling of Rezulin contributed to post-Vioxx reforms in drug safety monitoring, including the creation of the FDA's independent Drug Safety Oversight Board in 2005.
Sources
- Wikipedia — Troglitazone (FDA approved 29 Jan 1997; medical officer John Gueriguian removed; 63+ liver-failure deaths; UK withdrawal Dec 1997; US withdrawal 21 Mar 2000; $2.1B sales; Pfizer paid $750M for 35,000 claims 2009)
- BBC News — Pfizer faces Rezulin claims (troglitazone liver toxicity, $750M settlement for 35,000 claims, medical officer removed after company complaint)
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Physicist faked room-temp superconductivity — 5 retractions, thesis 21% plagiarized
Stanford president resigned over manipulated images — 5 papers retracted or corrected
Zantac was the world's bestselling heartburn drug — then it turned out to cause cancer
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.