The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Strategic decision · 1994–2002
Ratto won Volkswagen's pitch — then conceded the fees that sank the agency
In 2001 Ratto won the pitch Volkswagen ran against DDB — then conceded a fee cut that halved the account and helped sink the agency.
Ratto
HearsayWidely repeated, and we cannot show you a document for it. Read it for the lesson, not as fact.
What it means today
A founder who refuses a rescue that would cost his son's place, then concedes the fees that halve the account, has bet the business on two things that cannot pay its debts. Loyalty is not solvency.
What happened
David Ratto founded his Argentine agency in 1974 and turned it into one of the country's most famous, serving Volkswagen for much of the 1990s and carrying the BBDO network name for fourteen years as Ratto/BBDO. Then the founder unwound it himself.
Ratto dates the beginning of the end to 1994, when he removed the word David from the company name — the personal equity, in his own telling, that the relationships ran on. In January 2001, after a year of negative balance, BBDO's Latin America chairman offered to buy a majority of the shares. The condition was that Ratto return to the presidency and that his son Carlos and his partner Roberto leave. Ratto refused without hesitating: he always believed the agency's continuity was given by the presence of his son.
The same year Volkswagen pitted Ratto against DDB in a pitch. Ratto's presentation won — but DDB countered by cutting its fee ask from 7.5 to 6 percent of investment, and Ratto conceded. He negotiated to attend only 50 percent of the account, by contract, until April. He calls accepting those conditions "another big mistake of ours."
Debt reached around five million Argentine pesos. A rescue with Eduardo Fischer stalled when Argentina's December 2001 crisis changed the rules of the game. In 2002 the agency entered convocatoria de acreedores, and by Easter the Quintana Street office stood empty with a "for rent" sign — the account that walked, told by the man who lost it.
Why it happened
- Removing the founder's name in 1994 — the personal equity the relationships ran on; Ratto himself dates the beginning of the end to that decision
- Refusing the 2001 BBDO majority buyout because it would remove his son, betting the agency's continuity on family presence rather than solvency
- Winning the VW pitch but conceding DDB's fee cut from 7.5 to 6 percent, granting only half the account by contract
The lesson
A founder's loyalty can outlast the business. Ratto refused the rescue that would have cost his son's place, then conceded the fees that halved the account — and the agency closed anyway.
Aftermath
The agency did not survive. It entered convocatoria de acreedores in 2002, the Quintana Street office cleared and put up for rent, and a rescue with Eduardo Fischer stalled when Argentina's December 2001 crisis rewrote the deal. David Ratto's own retelling made it the account the trade still talks about — the pitch won, the fees conceded, the agency gone.
Sources
- Adlatina — El fin de una marca, el comienzo de una leyenda (interview with David Ratto, 30 May 2002)
- David Ratto — Wikipedia (es)
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Mainstreet Records cut MC Poze do Rodo after two arrests in fourteen months
Havas Costa Rica's 'Lessons of Shame' — Campaign couldn't verify the $73M claim
LePub's Cannes case study sold 45,000 jerseys — the client said it never approved it
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.