Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2015

Protein World's 'beach body ready' ad backfired — then its CEO called feminists terrorists

A bikini-clad 'Are you beach body ready?' Tube poster drew tens of thousands of petition signatures. Protein World's CEO then likened feminists to terrorists.

Protein World · 2015-04

What happened

In April 2015, the supplement brand Protein World put up posters across the London Underground showing a bikini-clad model under the question 'Are you beach body ready?', promoting its weight-loss products. Within days the campaign had become a national argument. Almost 60,000 people signed a petition calling for the ads to be taken down, a 'taking back the beach' protest was organised in Hyde Park, and the posters were defaced. Critics said the ad objectified women and promoted an unhealthy body image.

Britain's advertising regulator, the ASA, received 378 complaints. It first said the ad could not run again in its current form, citing concerns about its health and weight-loss claims, and opened an investigation into whether it was harmful or offensive. In July it ruled that the ad was not, in fact, offensive or irresponsible — a decision the eating-disorders charity Beat called 'extremely disappointing.' The regulator cleared the ad; the public had not.

Protein World's response made the story bigger. The company, which said it had received death threats, was unrepentant: its chief executive, Arjun Seth, likened feminists to 'terrorists,' and its head of marketing said it was 'great' that a controversial columnist had weighed in. The brand had turned a complaint about an ad into a fight with its critics. The ad never returned to the Underground in the same form, and 'beach body ready' became a shorthand for advertising that mistakes provocation for relevance.

Why it happened

  • The ad used a single idealised body as the measure of 'ready,' so it read less as motivation than as a judgement on everyone who did not look like the model.
  • Placing it across the Underground, where a captive public could not skip it, turned a product pitch into an unavoidable statement about bodies.
  • When criticised, the brand attacked its critics — likening feminists to terrorists — which confirmed the complaint that the brand did not respect the audience it was lecturing.
What it cost60,000-signature petition; protest; ad pulled from Tubeembarrassing

The lesson

A regulator clearing your ad is not the public accepting it. 'It's not offensive' is a legal answer to an emotional complaint — and calling critics terrorists guarantees they keep talking.

Aftermath

The ASA's clearance on offence did not end the argument; if anything, the brand's combative response kept it alive. Transport for London said it would be guided by the regulator if a similar ad were submitted again, and the campaign did not return in the same form. The case is now a standard reference in debates about body image in advertising, and about the difference between winning a ruling and losing the room. London later moved to restrict body-shaming ads on its transport network altogether.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →