The encyclopedia · R&D & Science · Product decision · 1998–2006
Pfizer spent $800M on a cholesterol drug — it raised mortality by 60%
Pfizer spent $800M on a cholesterol drug called torcetrapib. In 2006, a 15,000-patient trial showed it increased deaths by 60%. The drug was abandoned.
Pfizer · 2006-12-02
What happened
Torcetrapib was a cholesterol drug developed by Pfizer, the world's largest pharmaceutical company. It was designed to raise HDL (good) cholesterol by inhibiting CETP, a novel mechanism that had never been proven in a drug before. Pfizer invested over $800 million in its development, making it one of the most expensive R&D projects in the company's history, and built a dedicated manufacturing plant in Ireland in anticipation of approval.
The ILLUMINATE trial was a Phase III study enrolling 15,000 patients, half receiving torcetrapib combined with atorvastatin (Lipitor) and half receiving atorvastatin alone. On 2 December 2006, Pfizer halted the trial early after an independent data-monitoring committee found that the torcetrapib group had 82 fatal events versus 51 in the control group — a 60% increase in all-cause mortality. The drug also raised patients' blood pressure, cancelling out any benefit from its cholesterol effects.
The failure wiped out $800 million in R&D spending and the value of the Ireland manufacturing facility. Pfizer's stock fell 11% on the news. The collapse was especially damaging because torcetrapib had been considered Pfizer's most promising pipeline drug to replace Lipitor, its blockbuster cholesterol treatment that was approaching patent expiry. The case became the most cited example of the risk in pharmaceutical R&D — a drug that looked perfect on the biomarker but failed catastrophically in the patient.
Why it happened
- Torcetrapib raised HDL cholesterol and lowered LDL, but had off-target effects that increased blood pressure and caused a 60% increase in mortality.
- Pfizer bet $800M on a biomarker (HDL) without proving the mechanism improved outcomes, and the clinical trial revealed the drug was doing more harm than good.
- The company built manufacturing capacity and planned for blockbuster sales before the drug had completed Phase III trials, locking in costs that were lost entirely when the trial failed.
The lesson
A drug that looks perfect on a biomarker can still kill patients. Pfizer spent $800M on torcetrapib because it raised HDL and lowered LDL — but the patients died anyway. Biomarkers are not outcomes.
Sources
- Torcetrapib — Wikipedia
- SEC filing (Tier 1) — Pfizer 8-K Ex-99.1 press release (2 Dec 2006; Pfizer stops all torcetrapib clinical trials; the ILLUMINATE trial; the independent Data Safety Monitoring Board found an 'imbalance of mortality and cardiovascular events'; FDA notified; CEO Jeffrey B. Kindler quoted)
- PubMed / NEJM (Tier 1) — Barter et al., 'Effects of Torcetrapib in Patients at High Risk for Coronary Events', N Engl J Med 2007;357:2109-22 (ILLUMINATE primary publication; 15,067 patients; HDL +72.1%, LDL −24.9%; systolic blood pressure +5.4 mm Hg; hazard ratio for death from any cause 1.58, 95% CI 1.14–2.19; trial terminated early)
- The Seattle Times (AP) — Cholesterol-drug trials are halted (3 Dec 2006; Pfizer spent around $800 million developing torcetrapib; roughly 7,500 patients per arm; 82 deaths in the torcetrapib group vs 51 in the control group)
- Chemical & Engineering News — Pfizer Pulls Torcetrapib (4 Dec 2006; 82 vs 51 deaths; blood-pressure concerns flagged since March 2006; torcetrapib described as the most important development program at Pfizer)
- Twin Cities Pioneer Press — Pfizer shares fall on drug failure (5 Dec 2006; Pfizer shares fell $2.96, or 10.6%, to close at $24.90 on Monday)
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Physicist faked room-temp superconductivity — 5 retractions, thesis 21% plagiarized
Biogen pushed aducanumab past a 10-1 FDA panel rejection — three panelists resigned
Stanford president resigned over manipulated images — 5 papers retracted or corrected
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.